LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-62145: Local Privilege Escalation in Gaia Portal

A vulnerability in Check Point Gaia Portal allows an authenticated attacker with read-only Gaia Portal privileges to execute commands with root privileges.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An attacker with a read-only Gaia Portal account could gain root control of an affected Check Point gateway or management system. Root access could expose sensitive configuration, enable unauthorized changes, and disrupt security operations. Exploitation requires authentication and has high complexity, but the potential impact is complete compromise of the device.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment now and remediate exposed or high-value systems promptly. Although authentication and high complexity reduce likelihood, successful exploitation grants root privileges on security infrastructure, creating material confidentiality, integrity, availability, and operational risk.

Technical view

CVE-2026-62145 is a CWE-269 privilege-management flaw in Gaia Portal. An authenticated, low-privilege portal user can execute commands as root without user interaction. CVSS 3.1 rates it 7.5: network-accessible, high complexity, low privileges required, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure includes listed Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management releases, through R82.10 Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 and specified earlier versions. Risk is greatest where Gaia Portal is reachable by untrusted networks or read-only accounts are weakly controlled. The bundle provides no CPE identifiers.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not establish active exploitation, public exploit availability, or inclusion in CISA KEV. Exploitation requires an authenticated read-only Gaia Portal account and high attack complexity. Treat exposed administrative portals and potentially compromised credentials as important risk multipliers.

Researcher notes

The supplied evidence identifies improper privilege management but does not describe the vulnerable component, root cause, attack prerequisites beyond authentication, indicators of compromise, or a confirmed fixed release. Avoid inferring exploit mechanics. Validate remediation details directly from Check Point sk185153.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Check Point advisory sk185153 for the vendor-approved remediation and applicable software take.
  • Inventory affected gateways and management systems, including their release and Jumbo Hotfix Take.
  • Restrict Gaia Portal access to trusted administrative networks and authorized users.
  • Review read-only portal accounts and disable unnecessary or stale access.
  • Prioritize vendor remediation for internet-reachable or high-value management systems.

Validation and detection

  • Compare each system release and Jumbo Hotfix Take against the affected-version list.
  • Confirm Gaia Portal is not reachable from untrusted networks unless operationally required.
  • Audit read-only account membership, authentication controls, and recent access.
  • Review device logs for unexpected privileged commands or configuration changes.
  • Verify remediation status against Check Point advisory sk185153.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-62145 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.65.9checkpoint

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-62145Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
checkpointQuantum Security GatewayR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 118 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 158 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80, and R77.30Listed
checkpointQuantum Security ManagementR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 118 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 158 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80, and R77.30Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.