CVE-2026-62144: Management Authentication Bypass and Privilege Escalation
An authentication bypass vulnerability in Check Point Security Management and Multi-Domain Security Management allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute administrative commands on the Management Server. Successful exploitation may also allow command execution on managed Security Gateways. Exploitation requires network access to the Management Server without firewall protection or a configuration that does not restrict Trusted Clients.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This critical flaw can let an unauthenticated remote attacker take administrative control of vulnerable Check Point management servers. Compromise may extend to managed Security Gateways, threatening security policy integrity and sensitive configuration data. Exposure depends on whether the Management Server is reachable without firewall protection or Trusted Clients restrictions.
Executive priority
Treat this as an immediate priority for exposed or insufficiently restricted management infrastructure. These systems control security policy across downstream gateways, so compromise could undermine broader network defences. Require rapid asset identification, access restriction, vendor-guided remediation, and review for suspicious administrative changes.
Technical view
CVE-2026-62144 is a CWE-287 authentication bypass affecting listed Quantum Security Management and Multi-Domain Security Management releases. It permits remote administrative command execution without credentials and may enable command execution on managed gateways. CVSS 3.1 rates it 9.1: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Highest risk applies to affected Management Servers reachable over a network without firewall protection or properly restricted Trusted Clients. The bundle identifies affected releases through R82.10 Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 and below, plus specified older branches. It provides no asset-specific evidence, so organisations must inventory deployments and verify configurations.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not identify this CVE as CISA KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation nevertheless requires only network access under the stated insecure exposure conditions, making reachable vulnerable management systems urgent investigation targets.
Researcher notes
The reported impact is authentication bypass followed by administrative command execution on the Management Server, with possible execution on managed gateways. CVSS records high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. The provided evidence does not describe the vulnerable component, protocol, indicators of compromise, patch identifiers, or observed exploitation; consult the vendor advisory for those details.
Mitigation direction
Restrict Management Server access using firewall controls and properly configured Trusted Clients.
Identify affected Quantum and Multi-Domain Security Management versions across all environments.
Consult Check Point advisory sk185152 for current vendor-approved remediation and applicable updates.
Prioritise externally or broadly reachable management servers for immediate containment and remediation.
Review management access logs for unexplained administrative activity.
Validation and detection
Confirm each management server product, release, and Jumbo Hotfix Take.
Verify firewall rules limit Management Server access to authorised administration networks.
Confirm Trusted Clients restrictions are configured and enforced.
Compare installed versions against every affected range in the CVE record.
After remediation, verify the installed update against Check Point guidance.
Investigate managed gateways for unauthorised commands or configuration changes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-287: Credential and account abuse lookup
Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
checkpointQuantum Security ManagementR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 118 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 158 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80, and R77.30Listed
checkpointMulti-Domain Security ManagementR82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 36 or below, R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 118 or below, R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 158 or below, R81.10, R81, R80.30, R80.20, R80.10, R80, and R77.30Listed
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-287 · source CWE mapping
Improper Authentication
Improper Authentication represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.