LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-61183: Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (...

Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Reporting). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the affected application over HTTP may take complete control. This could expose or alter sensitive product lifecycle information and disrupt availability. Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4 is the only affected version identified in the supplied sources.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent remediation item because reachable affected systems may be taken over without credentials. Prioritize externally reachable and business-critical instances, establish ownership immediately, and require evidence of vendor-guided remediation and post-remediation validation.

Technical view

CVE-2026-61183 affects the Reporting component in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4. It is network-accessible, low-complexity, requires no privileges or user interaction, and may cause complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss. The record maps it to improper or missing authentication weaknesses, CWE-287 and CWE-306.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where version 6.2.4 is deployed and an attacker can reach its HTTP service. Internet-facing systems are the clearest concern, but reachable internal instances may also be exposed. The supplied evidence does not identify affected endpoints, configurations, or whether earlier or unsupported versions are vulnerable.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is described as easily exploitable and capable of application takeover without authentication. However, it is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no supplied source reports active exploitation. That absence is not proof that exploitation has not occurred.

Researcher notes

The supplied record establishes the affected component, version, access path, impact, CVSS vector, and authentication-related CWEs. It does not disclose the vulnerable endpoint, underlying implementation defect, indicators of compromise, patch identifier, or confirmed exploitation. Researchers should consult Oracle's advisory for remediation specifics without assuming unlisted versions are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory every Oracle Agile PLM for Process instance and confirm its installed version.
  • Review Oracle's July 2026 advisory and apply the vendor-prescribed remediation promptly.
  • Until remediated, restrict HTTP access to trusted networks where operationally feasible.
  • Increase monitoring for suspicious unauthenticated requests and unexpected application changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether each instance runs the identified affected version, 6.2.4.
  • Document whether HTTP access is internet-facing, partner-accessible, or reachable from internal networks.
  • Verify Oracle's prescribed update or mitigation using vendor-supported inventory and configuration evidence.
  • Review HTTP and security logs for unusual unauthenticated access, configuration changes, or outages.
  • Reassess network reachability after remediation or compensating controls are applied.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-287: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-61183 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9oracle

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-61183Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Oracle CorporationOracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process6.2.4Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-287 · source CWE mapping

Improper Authentication

Improper Authentication represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-306 · source CWE mapping

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Missing Authentication for Critical Function represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.