LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-60121: Vitec Flamingo 4.12.2 Unauthenticated OS Command Injection via ping.php

Vitec Flamingo 4.12.2 contains an unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the admin/ajax/ping.php endpoint that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by exploiting a double-evaluation flaw in shell argument handling. The endpoint applies escapeshellarg() to the user-supplied host POST parameter before passing it to a system wrapper, but the wrapper retrieves the decoded value from argv and incorporates it into a second shell_exec() call without escaping, allowing injected commands to execute with root privileges via passwordless sudo.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

VITEC Flamingo 4.12.2 contains a remotely reachable flaw that can let an unauthenticated attacker run operating-system commands as root. If the vulnerable management endpoint is exposed, compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and service availability. The supplied sources do not identify a fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed Flamingo 4.12.2 deployments as an immediate remediation priority, especially when management services are externally reachable. Isolate exposure now, investigate for suspicious activity, and obtain vendor-supported remediation. Root-level, unauthenticated command execution creates a credible risk of full appliance compromise and operational disruption.

Technical view

The admin/ajax/ping.php endpoint escapes the host parameter initially, but a wrapper later decodes the argument and inserts it unescaped into another shell_exec() call. This double evaluation enables OS command injection. Passwordless sudo reportedly causes injected commands to execute with root privileges. The issue is classified as CWE-78 with CVSS 3.1 score 9.8.

Likely exposure

Confirmed scope is VITEC Flamingo 4.12.2 where admin/ajax/ping.php is reachable by an attacker. Internet-facing or broadly accessible management interfaces present the greatest risk. The bundle provides no evidence that earlier or later versions are affected, so their status remains unknown.

Exploitation context

Public technical disclosure and a third-party advisory exist, indicating that exploitation details are publicly known. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source establishes active exploitation in the wild. Exploitability is nevertheless assessed as straightforward because authentication and user interaction are unnecessary.

Researcher notes

The reported weakness is not a simple failure of escapeshellarg(); protection is lost when a downstream wrapper reconstructs a second shell command from decoded argv data. Assessment should trace the complete execution chain and privilege boundary. The sources do not name a fixed release, vendor patch, observed indicators, or evidence of real-world exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Block untrusted access to admin/ajax/ping.php using firewalls, reverse proxies, or access controls.
  • Restrict Flamingo management interfaces to trusted administrative networks or authenticated VPN access.
  • Contact VITEC and check current vendor guidance for a patched release or supported workaround.
  • Disable the affected endpoint if operationally safe until authoritative remediation is available.
  • Review and remove unnecessary passwordless sudo permissions as defense in depth.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether VITEC Flamingo 4.12.2 is installed across all managed environments.
  • Verify unauthenticated users cannot reach admin/ajax/ping.php from untrusted networks.
  • Review HTTP logs for unexpected POST requests targeting the affected endpoint.
  • Inspect process, shell, and sudo logs for anomalous commands associated with the web service.
  • After remediation, confirm endpoint restrictions and normal product functionality without sending injection payloads.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-60121 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-60121Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
VITECFlamingo4.12.2affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.