LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-59726: Ruflo: Unauthenticated RCE in MCP bridge default docker-compose deployment

Ruflo is an agent meta-harness for Claude Code and Codex. Prior to 3.16.3, ruflo's default docker-compose deployment exposed the MCP bridge POST /mcp and POST /mcp/:group endpoints without authentication, allowing an unauthenticated network attacker to invoke tools/call to terminal_execute, obtain a shell in the bridge container, read provider API keys, and poison AgentDB learning-store patterns. This issue is fixed in version 3.16.3.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-59726 is a critical issue in Ruflo before 3.16.3. The default docker-compose deployment exposed MCP bridge endpoints without authentication. A network attacker could run terminal actions inside the bridge container, access provider API keys, and alter AgentDB learning-store patterns. This is fixed in Ruflo 3.16.3.

Executive priority

Treat as an immediate remediation item for any exposed Ruflo deployment. The business risk is secret theft, attacker command execution inside the bridge container, and manipulation of agent behavior. Prioritize upgrade and exposure reduction before broader hardening.

Technical view

Ruflo versions before 3.16.3 expose POST /mcp and POST /mcp/:group unauthenticated in the default docker-compose MCP bridge. The advisory describes unauthenticated tool invocation leading to terminal_execute, container shell access, credential exposure, and AgentDB poisoning. CVSS 3.1 is 10.0 with network, low-complexity, no-privilege, no-user-interaction characteristics.

Likely exposure

Highest concern is Ruflo deployments using the default docker-compose MCP bridge and reachable over an untrusted network. Exposure depends on whether the MCP bridge endpoints are network-accessible and whether versions are below 3.16.3.

Exploitation context

The CVE record and GitHub advisory describe unauthenticated remote code execution potential. The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The issue is still urgent because no credentials or user interaction are required when the vulnerable service is exposed.

Researcher notes

Evidence comes from the CVE record and Ruflo GitHub advisory, PR, commit, and v3.16.3 release. The sources name the affected product and fixed version, but do not provide independent exploitation telemetry. Avoid assuming impact beyond the MCP bridge container and described credential or AgentDB effects.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Ruflo to version 3.16.3 or later.
  • Restrict network access to MCP bridge endpoints.
  • Remove public exposure of default docker-compose MCP bridge deployments.
  • Rotate provider API keys if exposure is suspected.
  • Review vendor advisory and release notes for configuration guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Ruflo deployments and identify versions below 3.16.3.
  • Check whether /mcp or /mcp/:group are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review docker-compose deployments for default MCP bridge exposure.
  • Inspect logs for unexpected MCP tool calls or terminal activity.
  • Check AgentDB learning-store patterns for unauthorized changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-942: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-59726 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

10Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-59726Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ruvnetruflo< 3.16.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.