LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-5947: SIG(0) validation during query flood may lead to undefined behavior

Undefined behavior may result due to a race condition leading to a use-after-free violation. If BIND receives an incoming DNS message signed with SIG(0), it begins work to validate that signature. If, during that validation, the "recursive-clients" limit is reached (as would occur during a query flood), and that same DNS message is discarded per the limit, there is a brief window of time while the SIG(0) validation may attempt to read the now-discarded DNS message. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.22, 9.21.0 through 9.21.21, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1. BIND 9 versions 9.18.28 through 9.18.49 and 9.18.28-S1 through 9.18.49-S1 are NOT affected.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote, unauthenticated attacker could potentially disrupt vulnerable BIND 9 DNS services by combining SIG(0)-signed DNS messages with enough traffic to exhaust the recursive-client limit. A race condition can then access discarded memory, causing undefined behavior and threatening DNS availability. The supplied evidence does not establish data theft, record manipulation, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for vulnerable production DNS infrastructure. Patch exposed or business-critical servers promptly because DNS disruption can affect many dependent services. Emergency incident escalation is not justified solely by the supplied evidence, which shows no confirmed active exploitation, but query-flood exposure and operational criticality should shorten remediation timelines.

Technical view

During SIG(0) validation, BIND may discard the same DNS message when the recursive-clients limit is reached. A brief race window can then produce a use-after-free read and undefined behavior. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges or interaction, with high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to BIND 9 versions 9.20.0–9.20.22, 9.21.0–9.21.21, and 9.20.9-S1–9.20.22-S1 receiving relevant DNS traffic. Versions 9.18.28–9.18.49 and corresponding S1 releases are explicitly unaffected. Internet-accessible DNS services and systems susceptible to recursive-client saturation warrant prompt review.

Exploitation context

The condition requires a SIG(0)-signed incoming DNS message, concurrent validation, and exhaustion of the recursive-clients limit, such as during a query flood. The CVSS assessment treats exploitation as remotely reachable and low complexity. The bundle marks KEV false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation; real-world exploitation status therefore remains unconfirmed.

Researcher notes

The relevant weakness chain is concurrency-related: race and time-of-check/time-of-use behavior culminate in use-after-free access. The documented outcome is undefined behavior, while the CVSS vector claims availability impact without confidentiality or integrity impact. Sources do not specify a reliable crash signature, exploitation prevalence, or whether memory access can produce consequences beyond denial of service.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade 9.20 deployments to BIND 9.20.23 or a later vendor-approved fixed release.
  • Upgrade 9.21 deployments to BIND 9.21.22 or a later vendor-approved fixed release.
  • For S1 or packaged distributions, follow ISC or distributor guidance for the appropriate fixed build.
  • Apply Red Hat RHSA-2026:7412 where its listed packages and systems are applicable.
  • Prioritize externally reachable DNS servers and maintain service resilience while updates are deployed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory BIND versions across authoritative, recursive, forwarding, and internally managed DNS servers.
  • Confirm no installation falls within the affected version ranges.
  • Verify upgraded binaries or packages match ISC or distributor fixed-release guidance.
  • Review DNS telemetry for query floods, recursive-client saturation, crashes, or unexpected restarts.
  • Confirm explicitly unaffected 9.18 installations have not been misclassified as vulnerable.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-362: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-367: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-5947 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
8Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6isc
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-5947Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPbind: SIG(0) validation during query flood may lead to undefined behavior
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-19T09:59:51.277Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-21T12:15:50.513Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ISCBIND 99.20.0, 9.21.0, 9.20.9-S1, 9.18.28, 9.18.28-S1unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-362 · source CWE mapping

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-367 · source CWE mapping

Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.