LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-59260: OpenWrt luci-app-samba4 read ACL remote code execution via smbd

OpenWrt luci-app-samba4 read ACL grants file.exec permission on /usr/sbin/smbd, allowing authenticated delegated users to execute the Samba daemon with caller-controlled command-line arguments. Attackers can pass arbitrary Samba global options such as message command to a root smbd process, triggering command execution when SMB protocol messages are processed.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated delegated OpenWrt LuCI user may be able to turn limited Samba management access into root-level command execution. This is serious for routers and embedded gateways because compromise can expose traffic, credentials, and internal networks. The source bundle does not name affected versions or a fixed release.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority infrastructure issue where OpenWrt devices are centrally managed or delegated access exists. Prioritize internet-adjacent and branch-network devices first, then reduce LuCI exposure and delegated permissions while awaiting or applying vendor guidance.

Technical view

The issue is an improper privilege assignment in OpenWrt LuCI’s luci-app-samba4 ACLs. A read ACL grants file.exec on /usr/sbin/smbd, letting authenticated delegated users run smbd with caller-controlled arguments. Sources describe abuse of Samba global options leading to command execution in a root smbd process.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to OpenWrt systems running LuCI with luci-app-samba4 installed and delegated authenticated users configured. Risk is higher where LuCI management is reachable from untrusted networks or shared administrative environments. The bundle does not provide version ranges.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates network access, low privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The source bundle and KEV flag do not support claiming active exploitation. Exploitation requires authenticated delegated access, not unauthenticated internet-only access.

Researcher notes

The public bundle identifies CWE-269 and CVSS 8.8, but omits exact affected versions, fixed versions, and observed exploitation evidence. Analysis should focus on ACL exposure, package presence, and management-plane reachability without assuming all OpenWrt installations are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the OpenWrt LuCI advisory for fixed packages or vendor-recommended configuration changes.
  • Update luci-app-samba4 and related LuCI packages when vendor fixes are available.
  • Remove luci-app-samba4 where Samba management through LuCI is unnecessary.
  • Restrict LuCI access to trusted management networks or VPN users only.
  • Review and minimize delegated LuCI permissions for non-admin users.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenWrt devices running LuCI and luci-app-samba4.
  • Identify delegated LuCI users and review their Samba-related ACL grants.
  • Check whether any ACL permits file.exec on /usr/sbin/smbd.
  • Compare installed packages against the OpenWrt advisory when version guidance is available.
  • Review management access logs for unexpected delegated-user activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-59260 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9VulnCheck
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-59260Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
openwrtluciSee advisoryaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.