LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-54982: Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Windows RMCAST can let an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network run code on an affected computer. Successful exploitation could expose data, alter systems, or interrupt operations. The network-adjacency requirement limits reach compared with an internet-routable flaw, but the lack of authentication and user interaction makes nearby untrusted networks important exposure points.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority patching and exposure-review issue. Focus first on affected servers and endpoints reachable from shared or untrusted adjacent networks. Require evidence of update deployment and segmentation coverage. Emergency internet-wide action is not supported by the supplied evidence, but unauthenticated code execution with high potential impact warrants prompt remediation.

Technical view

CVE-2026-54982 is an integer-underflow vulnerability in the Windows Reliable Multicast Transport Driver. It has CVSS 3.1 score 8.8: adjacent-network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The supplied affected list spans specified Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases, including several Server Core installations.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where listed Windows systems can receive RMCAST-related traffic from adjacent or insufficiently segmented networks. Potentially affected assets include endpoints and servers on shared local networks. The bundle does not establish whether RMCAST must be explicitly enabled, which ports or configurations are exposed, or whether network controls already block access.

Exploitation context

The supplied record does not support claims of active exploitation: KEV is false, and the CVSS vector marks exploit-code maturity as unproven. Exploitation nevertheless requires no credentials or user action and has low stated complexity. An attacker must have adjacent-network reachability, so compromised local devices, shared networks, and weak segmentation are relevant threat contexts.

Researcher notes

The source bundle identifies CWE-191 integer underflow in RMCAST but provides no root-cause detail, packet conditions, affected code path, indicators, or safe detection signature. Do not infer internet reachability from the CVSS vector. Validate product applicability, update status, RMCAST exposure, and adjacent-network reachability against Microsoft guidance without treating the listed base versions as patched-state thresholds.

Mitigation direction

  • Use Microsoft’s CVE update guide to identify and deploy the applicable security updates.
  • Prioritize exposed servers, shared-network endpoints, and systems lacking strong local-network segmentation.
  • Restrict unnecessary adjacent-network access to RMCAST-related services using approved network controls.
  • Monitor Microsoft guidance for configuration-specific mitigations or revised affected-version information.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory the listed Windows client and server releases, including Server Core installations.
  • Verify applicable Microsoft security updates are installed successfully on each potentially affected asset.
  • Confirm version and update compliance through centralized endpoint or vulnerability-management reporting.
  • Review network segmentation and determine which systems can receive relevant adjacent-network traffic.
  • Retest affected assets after remediation and investigate update failures or unsupported systems.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-191: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-54982 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C2.85.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-54982Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19044.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 25H210.0.26200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 26H110.0.28000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 20126.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)6.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R26.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)6.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-191 · source CWE mapping

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.