CVE-2026-54210: TeamDavid: Buffer Overflow in file names of file upload functionalities
Tobit Laboratories AG TeamDavid's Webbox application implements various file upload functionalities that are
vulnerable to a buffer overflow condition. By specifying an excessively
long filename in a file upload request, an unauthenticated attacker can
trigger a crash of the server, resulting in a denial of service.
Depending on the stack state or if a stack canary can be disclosed
through another vulnerability, this buffer overflow could potentially be
exploited for remote code execution, leading to full compromise of the
server. This issue affects TeamDavid before Rollout 528.
Starting with Rollout 528 (June 30, 2026), the affected functionality is disabled by default and the vulnerabilities are therefore no longer exposed through this functionality.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
TeamDavid Webbox accepts overly long uploaded filenames that can crash the server without authentication. Under additional favorable conditions, the memory corruption might permit remote code execution and full server compromise, but the sources do not confirm successful code execution. TeamDavid versions before Rollout 528 are affected. Rollout 528 disables the vulnerable functionality by default.
Executive priority
Treat internet-accessible pre-528 Webbox systems as an urgent remediation priority because unauthenticated requests can disrupt service and may enable compromise under additional conditions. Upgrade promptly, verify the feature state, and reduce network exposure meanwhile. Do not describe remote code execution or active exploitation as confirmed.
Technical view
CVE-2026-54210 is a network-reachable out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in Webbox file-upload functionality. A crafted, excessively long filename can cause denial of service. Remote code execution is described as conditional on stack state or disclosure of a stack canary through another vulnerability. The CVSS 4.0 score is 9.5, with high attack complexity and no required privileges or user interaction.
Likely exposure
Highest exposure exists where a pre-Rollout 528 TeamDavid Webbox exposes affected file-upload functionality to untrusted networks. Rollout 528 or later is not exposed through this functionality when its new disabled-by-default setting remains unchanged. The supplied sources do not identify specific upload endpoints, configurations, or internet-exposure prevalence.
Exploitation context
Unauthenticated remote denial of service is supported by the advisory description. Remote code execution is plausible but conditional, not demonstrated. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation or public weaponization.
Researcher notes
The record establishes filename-triggered memory corruption but provides insufficient detail about the affected endpoints, memory layout, platform protections, or reproducibility. Assess denial-of-service exposure separately from conditional code-execution risk. Rollout 528 reduces exposure by disabling functionality by default; the supplied evidence does not establish whether the underlying unsafe code was removed.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade TeamDavid to Rollout 528 or later.
Confirm the affected file-upload functionality remains disabled after upgrading.
Restrict Webbox exposure to trusted networks where immediate upgrading is unavailable.
Monitor Tobit Laboratories guidance for additional fixes or configuration requirements.
Validation and detection
Inventory TeamDavid deployments and record their installed rollout versions.
Identify Webbox instances reachable from the internet or other untrusted networks.
Verify affected upload functionality is disabled on Rollout 528 or later.
Review server logs and availability events for unexplained Webbox crashes.
Use safe configuration inspection; avoid destructive filename testing on production systems.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-787 · source CWE mapping
Out-of-bounds Write
Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.