LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-54109: Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in Windows ReFS can let an already authorized local attacker run code and potentially compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The issue is high severity, but the supplied evidence does not show remote attack access or exploitation in the wild.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patching item, especially on ReFS servers or shared systems where low-privileged users have local access. It is not supported as an internet-remote emergency, but successful exploitation could materially affect data and operations.

Technical view

CVE-2026-54109 is an integer overflow or wraparound in Windows ReFS, associated with CWE-190 and CWE-122. It scores CVSS 3.1 7.8: local access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure includes the listed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server versions, including specified Server Core installations. ReFS-using systems deserve priority. The supplied sources do not identify the precise vulnerable operation, required ReFS configuration, or reliable compensating controls.

Exploitation context

The attacker must already be authorized, have local access, and possess low privileges. No user interaction is required. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence establishes active exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

The title says remote code execution, but the supplied description and CVSS vector specify local exploitation. Do not infer network reachability. Important unknowns include the vulnerable ReFS operation, resulting execution context, trigger conditions, affected configurations, and whether proof-of-concept material exists.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s CVE advisory and deploy its applicable security updates promptly.
  • Prioritize affected servers and endpoints using ReFS or handling less-trusted local users.
  • Restrict unnecessary local accounts and privileges while updates are pending.
  • Check Microsoft guidance for any product-specific mitigations or prerequisites not included here.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems against every Windows edition and version listed in the advisory.
  • Identify affected hosts using ReFS volumes or ReFS-dependent workloads.
  • Confirm applicable Microsoft security updates using the advisory’s current build or KB criteria.
  • Re-scan patched systems and document exceptions requiring deferred remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-54109 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C1.85.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-54109Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19044.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 25H210.0.26200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 26H110.0.28000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.