LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-51808: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code...

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenHTJ2K versions 0.18.4 and earlier are reported vulnerable to a critical buffer overflow in decoder code. If an organization uses this library to process untrusted HTJ2K/JPEG 2000 content, a successful attack could allow arbitrary code execution with major confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as urgent for any environment processing untrusted images with OpenHTJ2K. Business risk is high because the reported impact includes arbitrary code execution and full CIA compromise. If OpenHTJ2K is not used, risk is limited to monitoring and documentation.

Technical view

CVE-2026-51808 is a CWE-120 buffer overflow in OpenHTJ2K decoder.cpp, specifically openhtj2k_decoder_impl invoke-related functions. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The public record lists affected metadata as n/a, limiting asset-matching precision.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is applications, services, or pipelines that embed OpenHTJ2K 0.18.4 or earlier and decode externally supplied image content. CPE and vendor/product fields are not populated, so dependency inventory is the practical exposure source.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation without authentication or user interaction. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation. Treat exploitation status as unconfirmed, not absent.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for vulnerability type, location, severity, and affected version range from the CVE description. Public metadata is incomplete for vendor/product/CPE mapping. Do not claim exploitation in the wild without additional sourced evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any direct or transitive OpenHTJ2K dependency.
  • Check OpenHTJ2K changelog, PR #320, and v0.18.5 release guidance.
  • Prioritize vendor-recommended fixed release if running 0.18.4 or earlier.
  • Restrict untrusted image decoding paths until remediation is complete.
  • Monitor CVE and project references for corrected affected-version details.

Validation and detection

  • Search SBOMs and build manifests for OpenHTJ2K usage.
  • Confirm deployed OpenHTJ2K versions are not 0.18.4 or earlier.
  • Review services that decode externally supplied HTJ2K/JPEG 2000 files.
  • Verify remediation against vendor release notes or changelog.
  • Document unknowns where CPE metadata is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-51808 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-51808Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.