LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-51674: Incorrect access control in the setScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthe...

Incorrect access control in the setScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to configure forced reboot tasks via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A TOTOLINK T6 router running firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 may let an unauthenticated attacker schedule forced reboots through its management interface. This could disrupt network availability without requiring credentials or user interaction. The supplied evidence does not establish broader device takeover or data theft.

Executive priority

Treat confirmed affected and untrusted-reachable devices as urgent because exploitation requires no credentials and can interrupt connectivity. Prioritize exposure reduction and vendor-guidance review. Evidence is insufficient to claim active exploitation, a vendor patch, or broader compromise capabilities.

Technical view

CVE-2026-51674 is an incorrect access-control flaw (CWE-284) in setScheduleCfg. An unauthenticated network client can reportedly submit a crafted POST request to the router’s CGI management endpoint and configure forced-reboot tasks. CVSS 3.1 scores it 9.8, with network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and no interaction.

Likely exposure

Confirmed scope is TOTOLINK T6 firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015. Risk exists where the management CGI interface is reachable from untrusted networks or clients. The bundle provides no CPE data or evidence that other models or firmware versions are affected.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is remotely reachable without authentication according to the CVE description. It is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms active exploitation. Public coordination references exist, but the bundle does not establish exploit maturity or observed attacks.

Researcher notes

The description specifically demonstrates unauthorized forced-reboot scheduling, while the CVSS vector rates confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts High. The supplied material does not explain the broader confidentiality or integrity consequences. Structured affected-product fields are unavailable, so scope should remain limited to the explicitly named model and firmware.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify TOTOLINK T6 devices running firmware 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015.
  • Check current TOTOLINK guidance for corrected firmware or vendor-approved mitigation.
  • Restrict router management access to trusted administrative networks and hosts.
  • Disable Internet-facing or otherwise unnecessary remote management where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor affected routers for unexpected scheduled reboots or configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each router’s exact model and installed firmware version.
  • Determine whether the management interface is reachable from Internet or untrusted network segments.
  • Review configuration and logs for unexpected reboot schedules or unexplained outages.
  • Verify network controls limit management access to authorized administrative sources.
  • After remediation, confirm the firmware version and management-access restrictions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-51674 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-51674Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.