Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Squirro Cognitive Search versions before 3.14.2 reportedly allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary code through the password-reset function. Successful exploitation could expose data, alter systems, or disrupt service. The supplied record rates it critical at CVSS 9.8.
Executive priority
Prioritize immediate identification and remediation of internet-accessible instances. Assign accountable owners and an expedited maintenance window. If upgrading cannot occur promptly, restrict the affected function and monitor closely. Evidence of exploitation is incomplete, but the potential unauthenticated system compromise justifies emergency handling.
Technical view
CVE-2026-50772 is classified as CWE-94 code injection. A crafted password-reset payload can reportedly trigger remote code execution in Squirro Cognitive Search before 3.14.2. The CVSS vector indicates network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where Squirro Cognitive Search earlier than 3.14.2 is deployed and its password-reset function is remotely reachable. The bundle lacks CPEs, deployment prerequisites, and detailed affected-version metadata, so organizations must verify their inventory and configuration directly.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and this CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. A public researcher repository is referenced, but its presence alone does not prove exploitation in the wild. Treat reachable vulnerable instances as urgent because the reported path requires no authentication or user interaction.
Researcher notes
The record provides a concise vulnerability claim, CVSS vector, CWE-94 classification, and a version boundary. It does not provide CPEs, precise vulnerable builds, technical root cause, vendor advisory, confirmed indicators, or exploitation telemetry. Validate product identity and remediation status against current Squirro guidance before closing findings.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade affected Squirro Cognitive Search deployments to version 3.14.2 or later after confirming vendor guidance.
- Restrict external access to the password-reset function until remediation is complete.
- Apply compensating network controls to limit access to trusted users and administrative paths.
- Preserve relevant application and security logs before making remediation changes.
Validation and detection
- Inventory all Squirro Cognitive Search deployments and record their exact versions.
- Confirm whether each password-reset function is accessible from untrusted networks.
- Verify remediated instances report version 3.14.2 or later.
- Review password-reset and application logs for unexpected requests, errors, or process activity.
- Check vendor guidance for additional indicators, prerequisites, or configuration-specific remediation.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCredential and access behavior lookup
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-50772 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
9.8CriticalVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://docs.squirro.com/en/latest/products/cognitive-search.htmlCVE reference, mitre
- https://github.com/Henkel-CyberVM/CVEs/tree/main/CVE-2026-50772CVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Control of Generation of Code
Improper Control of Generation of Code represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.