CVE-2026-50633: Apache CXF: JNDI Injection vulnerability in DispatchMDBMessageListenerImpl
A JNDI Injection vulnerability has been discovered in Apache CXF's JCA integration module, which can allow for code execution, if an attacker is able to manipulate the JCA deployment descriptor (ra.xml) or runtime activation parameters. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7, which fixes this issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Apache CXF, a widely used open-source framework for building web services in Java applications, has a flaw in its JCA integration module that could let an attacker run their own code on a server. Exploitation requires the attacker to influence a deployment configuration file or runtime activation settings, so it is not a simple remote push-button attack, but the impact if triggered is severe. Exposure is limited to Java environments that deploy Apache CXF's JCA integration module (org.apache.cxf:cxf-integration-jca) as a resource adapter, typically in Jakarta EE / JBoss / WildFly application servers. Organizations not using CXF's JCA integration, or that tightly control ra.xml and activation parameters, face minimal exposure. Red Hat has issued RHSA-2026:37390 indicating downstream product impact. Treat as a high-priority patch for teams running Apache CXF's JCA integration in Java middleware. Impact is severe (code execution) but exploitation requires configuration-level access, so schedule remediation on the next standard patch cycle unless CXF JCA components are exposed to lower-trust operators. Mitigation focus: Upgrade Apache CXF to 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 (or later) across all Java services using cxf-integration-jca.; Apply Red Hat RHSA-2026:37390 updates to affected Red Hat middleware products.; Restrict who can modify ra.xml deployment descriptors and JCA activation parameters to trusted administrators only..
Prepared
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
6Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-20 · source CWE mapping
Improper Input Validation
Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.