LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-49952: Discuz! X5.0 Authentication Bypass via dbbak.php Encryption Oracle

Discuz! X5.0 releases 20260320 through 20260501 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to database backup and restore functionality by exploiting a shared cryptographic key between UCenter integration and the database backup API exposed by dbbak.php. Attackers can inject a crafted payload through the username parameter during login to abuse the encryption oracle in logging_ctl::logging_more(), obtain a legitimately signed token, and use it to bypass authorization for database export and import operations, with the additional ability to trigger a race condition to impersonate arbitrary users.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Discuz! X5.0 can mistakenly grant an unauthenticated internet attacker access to database backup and restore functions. Successful abuse could expose or alter sensitive forum data and may enable user impersonation. No user interaction or existing account is required.

Executive priority

Prioritize emergency assessment and remediation of public-facing affected installations. The vulnerability crosses an authentication boundary and could compromise database confidentiality and integrity. If patching cannot occur promptly, restrict the affected functionality and initiate focused log review.

Technical view

CVE-2026-49952 is a CWE-323 authentication bypass caused by shared cryptographic key use between UCenter integration and dbbak.php. The login path can act as an encryption oracle, producing a valid authorization token for database export or import. A related race condition may permit arbitrary-user impersonation. CVSS 4.0 is 9.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest for internet-accessible Discuz! X5.0 deployments running releases dated 20260320 through 20260501. Administrators should verify the precise build and whether the referenced corrective commit is present. The supplied evidence does not establish that every deployment exposes dbbak.php identically.

Exploitation context

Public technical material describes exploitability and vulnerability chaining, but the supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation in the wild. The CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV. Treat public-facing affected systems as urgent because exploitation requires no authentication or user interaction.

Researcher notes

The bundle supports the encryption-oracle, shared-key, database-operation, and race-condition claims. It identifies affected releases from 20260320 through 20260501 and links a corrective commit, but does not name a fixed release. It also provides no confirmed telemetry showing exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the vendor correction represented by the referenced DiscuzX commit after compatibility testing.
  • Check Discuz! vendor guidance for a confirmed fixed release and upgrade path.
  • Restrict public access to database backup and restore functionality until remediation is verified.
  • Protect database backups and rotate exposed credentials if investigation indicates unauthorized access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Discuz! X5.0 installations and record their exact release dates or commit revisions.
  • Confirm whether the referenced corrective commit is incorporated in each deployment.
  • Review login activity for anomalous username inputs associated with unexpected backup or restore requests.
  • Review database export, import, and user-account activity for unauthorized operations.
  • Retest authorization boundaries safely after remediation without using production data.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-323: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-49952 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N3.95.2VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-49952Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Discuz!Discuz! X5.020260320affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-323 · source CWE mapping

Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption

Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.