LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-49445: Cilium: Sensitive information disclosure and cluster disruption via local Envoy admin socket access

Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution. Prior to 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2, when Cilium L7 functionality is enabled, the embedded or standalone Envoy instance creates a world-accessible admin.sock on cluster nodes, allowing a local attacker to access Envoy admin endpoints, expose TLS secrets, disrupt cluster traffic, or terminate Envoy. This issue is fixed in versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2.

CriticalCVSS 9.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-49445 affects Cilium clusters using L7 functionality. A locally present attacker on a cluster node could reach Envoy’s admin socket because it is world-accessible, potentially exposing TLS secrets, disrupting traffic, or terminating Envoy. The vendor lists fixed versions for three maintained branches.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for Cilium-based production clusters using L7 policy or observability. The main business risks are sensitive TLS material exposure and disruption of cluster traffic. Prioritize patching exposed branches and validating whether L7 Envoy is active.

Technical view

Before Cilium 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2, embedded or standalone Envoy creates admin.sock with overly permissive access when L7 functionality is enabled. The issue is CWE-732 and scores CVSS 9.2 with local attack vector, no privileges, changed scope, high confidentiality impact, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Kubernetes environments running Cilium versions below 1.17.14, 1.18.8, or 1.19.2 where Cilium L7 functionality and Envoy are enabled. The described attacker position is local access on cluster nodes; the bundle does not prove remote network exploitability.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Practical risk depends on whether an attacker can gain local node access and reach the world-accessible Envoy admin socket. Impact can include secret exposure and cluster traffic disruption.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence comes from the CVE record and Cilium advisory. The bundle identifies affected branches, fixed releases, CWE-732, and CVSS details. It does not include evidence of exploitation in the wild, broader affected products, or safe compensating controls beyond upgrading and consulting vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Cilium 1.17 deployments to 1.17.14 or later.
  • Upgrade Cilium 1.18 deployments to 1.18.8 or later.
  • Upgrade Cilium 1.19 deployments to 1.19.2 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for branch-specific vendor guidance.
  • Reduce unnecessary local access to cluster nodes while upgrading.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cilium versions across all clusters and node pools.
  • Confirm whether Cilium L7 functionality is enabled.
  • Verify Envoy mode and admin socket exposure on cluster nodes.
  • Confirm patched clusters run 1.17.14, 1.18.8, 1.19.2, or later.
  • Review recent Envoy restarts or unexplained traffic disruption.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-732: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-49445 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.2CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H2.56GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.2Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-49445Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ciliumcilium< 1.17.14, >= 1.18.0, < 1.18.8, >= 1.19.0, < 1.19.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-732 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.