LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-48864: Libsolv: heap buffer overflow in libsolv repopagestore via unchecked decompression of malicious .solv page data

A flaw was found in libsolv. This heap buffer overflow occurs during the decompression of attacker-controlled compressed data within `.solv` files due to insufficient input validation. An attacker can provide a specially crafted `.solv` file, which, when processed by a vulnerable application, can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. This could result in information disclosure, alteration of program execution, or a denial of service.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Libsolv can mishandle malicious compressed data inside .solv files, causing memory corruption when a vulnerable application processes the file. The reported impact includes data exposure, altered execution, or denial of service. This is high risk where affected Red Hat systems may process untrusted .solv content.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for Linux platform and package-management environments. It is not marked as actively exploited in the provided sources, but the memory-corruption impact is serious and vendor advisories exist, so remediation should enter the near-term patch cycle.

Technical view

CVE-2026-48864 is a CWE-787 heap buffer overflow in libsolv repopagestore decompression. Insufficient validation of attacker-controlled compressed .solv page data can trigger out-of-bounds memory access. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local attack vector and required user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure centers on affected Red Hat products with vulnerable libsolv packages, including listed RHEL 7, 8, 9, 10, OpenShift Container Platform 4, Satellite 6, and Hardened Images. Red Hat Update Infrastructure 4 for Cloud Providers is listed as unaffected in the bundle.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The attack requires a specially crafted .solv file to be processed by a vulnerable application, so risk rises where repository metadata or solver inputs can originate from untrusted sources.

Researcher notes

Key unknowns are exploit maturity, reachable application paths, and fixed package versions, which are not included in the bundle. Validation should focus on whether local workflows or automated systems process attacker-influenced .solv files through vulnerable libsolv builds.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the linked Red Hat CVE page and RHSA advisories for fixed package guidance.
  • Update affected libsolv packages using the applicable Red Hat advisory channel.
  • Avoid processing untrusted .solv files until affected systems are remediated.
  • Prioritize systems that ingest repository or package metadata from less-trusted sources.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory libsolv package versions across affected Red Hat estates.
  • Map findings to the affected product and package list in Red Hat guidance.
  • Confirm RHUI 4 cloud-provider deployments match the listed unaffected status before deprioritizing.
  • Retest vulnerable workflows after applying vendor-provided updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-48864 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-48864Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsolv, 0:0.7.33-5.el10_2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsolv, 0:0.7.20-7.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsolv, 0:0.7.24-6.el9_8affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsolv, 0:0.7.24-6.el9_8affected
Red HatRed Hat Hardened Imageslibsolv-main, 0.7.38-2.hum1affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7libsolvaffected
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6satellite-capsule:el8/libsolvaffected
Red HatRed Hat Update Infrastructure 4 for Cloud Providerslibsolvunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.