LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-4874: Org.keycloak.protocol.oidc.grants: org.keycloak.services.managers: keycloak: server-side request forgery via oidc token endpoint manipulation

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated attacker can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by manipulating the `client_session_host` parameter during refresh token requests. This occurs when a Keycloak client is configured to use the `backchannel.logout.url` with the `application.session.host` placeholder. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to make HTTP requests from the Keycloak server’s network context, potentially probing internal networks or internal APIs, leading to information disclosure.

LowCVSS 3.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-4874 is a low-severity Keycloak SSRF issue. A logged-in attacker may cause Keycloak to send HTTP requests from the server’s network position, but only when a specific backchannel logout placeholder configuration is used. Impact is mainly limited information disclosure or internal network probing.

Executive priority

Treat as a planned patch and configuration review, not an emergency. Prioritize systems exposed to untrusted authenticated users or with broad internal network access. The business risk is unauthorized internal reconnaissance through a critical identity service.

Technical view

The flaw involves refresh token handling and manipulation of the client_session_host parameter. It applies when a Keycloak client uses backchannel.logout.url with the application.session.host placeholder. A successful authenticated request can trigger outbound HTTP requests from Keycloak’s network context. CVSS is 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to affected Red Hat Keycloak, JBoss EAP 8, EAP Expansion Pack, and Red Hat SSO 7 deployments using the vulnerable Keycloak services and the specific backchannel logout placeholder configuration. Internet-facing identity services may have higher practical monitoring priority.

Exploitation context

The CVE requires authentication and a non-default or specific client configuration. The source bundle does not indicate public exploit availability or active exploitation. CISA KEV status is false. The likely attacker goal is internal service discovery or limited information disclosure from the Keycloak server’s network location.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are important: authenticated attacker, high attack complexity, and the vulnerable placeholder-based backchannel logout configuration. Avoid assuming all Keycloak deployments are exploitable. Red Hat lists multiple affected product streams and advisories, with CVSS 3.1 and CWE-918.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Red Hat advisories RHSA-2026:25097, RHSA-2026:25098, RHSA-2026:30049, and RHSA-2026:30050.
  • Apply vendor-provided updates for affected Red Hat build of Keycloak, JBoss EAP, EAP XP, or SSO packages.
  • Confirm whether vulnerable clients use backchannel.logout.url with the application.session.host placeholder.
  • If updates are not yet possible, review vendor guidance and reduce risky backchannel logout configurations.
  • Restrict Keycloak outbound network access to only required destinations where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Keycloak and related Red Hat identity components against listed affected packages and versions.
  • Check client configurations for backchannel.logout.url containing the application.session.host placeholder.
  • Verify updated builds match Red Hat advisory guidance or listed unaffected builds where applicable.
  • Review Keycloak logs for unusual outbound request patterns during refresh token activity.
  • Confirm egress controls limit Keycloak access to internal APIs and metadata services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-4874 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.1CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N1.61.4redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.1Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-4874Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.4.13-1affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.6.3-3affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Build of Keycloakrhbk/keycloak-operator-bundleaffected
Red HatRed Hat Build of Keycloakrhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operatoraffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8keycloak-servicesaffected
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Packkeycloak-servicesaffected
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7keycloak-servicesaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.