Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A network-accessible, low-privileged attacker could exploit an SQL injection flaw in Adobe Campaign Classic without user interaction. Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary code execution with severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability consequences. The supplied data identifies ACC v7 7.4.3 build 9399, but version details require confirmation against Adobe’s advisory.
Executive priority
Treat this as an immediate remediation priority because compromise could cross security boundaries and severely affect data and operations. Confirm exposure promptly, prioritize reachable production instances, and track remediation to completion. Do not represent active exploitation as established from the supplied evidence.
Technical view
CVE-2026-48326 is a CWE-89 SQL injection vulnerability rated CVSS 9.9. Its vector indicates network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Code execution occurs in the current user’s context.
Likely exposure
Organizations running Adobe Campaign Classic should urgently inventory deployments, especially ACC v7 7.4.3 build 9399. Internet-accessible or broadly reachable instances present greater practical risk. The bundle’s additional version value “0” is ambiguous, so the complete affected range cannot be established from the supplied evidence.
Exploitation context
The vulnerability is remotely reachable and requires only low privileges, with no victim interaction. The supplied bundle does not report CISA KEV inclusion or provide evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation status should therefore be treated as unconfirmed, not active.
Researcher notes
The available record attributes SQL injection to improper neutralization and states arbitrary code execution is possible. It does not identify the vulnerable parameter, request path, database behavior, patch level, or observed attacks. Researchers should rely on Adobe’s advisory for authoritative version and remediation details without assuming undocumented attack mechanics.
Mitigation direction
- Check Adobe advisory APSB26-120 for supported remediation and precise affected versions.
- Apply Adobe’s prescribed update or mitigation after validating operational compatibility.
- Restrict ACC network access to trusted users and necessary systems.
- Minimize privileges for ACC accounts and associated database access.
- Increase monitoring until vendor remediation is confirmed deployed.
Validation and detection
- Inventory every Adobe Campaign Classic instance and record its exact version and build.
- Compare deployed builds with Adobe advisory APSB26-120.
- Confirm ACC administrative and application interfaces are not unnecessarily internet-accessible.
- Review authentication, application, and database logs for anomalous low-privileged activity.
- Verify vendor-prescribed remediation through version checks and controlled functional testing.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupDatabase behavior lookup
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-48326 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.9 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16adobeVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
9.9CriticalVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-120.htmlCVE reference, adobe · vendor-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.