CVE-2026-48324: ColdFusion | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89)
ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A critical SQL injection flaw in Adobe ColdFusion can let a highly privileged remote attacker run code with the affected process user’s permissions. No user interaction is required. Successful exploitation could compromise data, alter systems, and disrupt services, but the supplied sources do not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat this as an urgent remediation item for affected ColdFusion systems, prioritizing internet-facing and business-critical deployments. High privileges reduce initial exploitability, but arbitrary code execution and changed scope make successful exploitation potentially severe. Require owners to confirm inventory, Adobe guidance review, remediation status, and exposure reduction.
Technical view
CVE-2026-48324 is CWE-89 with CVSS 9.1: network-accessible, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, and changed scope. Successful SQL injection may produce arbitrary code execution as the current user, affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The bundle identifies ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 version ranges, but its compact version notation is ambiguous.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to affected ColdFusion 2025 or 2023 deployments where a highly privileged attacker can reach the vulnerable functionality. Internet-facing systems warrant faster review because the attack vector is network-based. The supplied evidence does not identify a vulnerable endpoint, configuration prerequisite, or precise interpretation of the listed version boundaries.
Exploitation context
The attacker requires high privileges, but exploitation is otherwise low complexity, remote, and requires no victim action. The supplied bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. KEV absence does not prove exploitation is not occurring.
Researcher notes
The source bundle supports SQL injection leading to arbitrary code execution, but does not disclose the affected endpoint, query path, proof of concept, indicators, or exact fixed releases. Its affected-version arrays—2025 [0,11] and 2023 [0,22]—should not be interpreted without checking Adobe APSB26-82.
Mitigation direction
Consult Adobe APSB26-82 for the authoritative affected versions and remediation instructions.
Apply Adobe’s specified security update after appropriate testing.
Restrict privileged ColdFusion access to trusted administrators and networks.
Reduce unnecessary internet exposure until remediation is confirmed.
Back up relevant systems and configuration before applying vendor-directed changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory all ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 instances, including externally exposed systems.
Record each instance’s exact update level and compare it with Adobe APSB26-82.
Confirm the Adobe-directed update is installed on every affected instance.
Verify privileged interfaces and vulnerable functionality are not unnecessarily internet-accessible.
Review relevant application and access logs for unexplained privileged activity or code execution.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.