CVE-2026-48322: ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94)
ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This critical ColdFusion flaw could let a remote attacker with low-level privileges run code as the ColdFusion process. No user action is required, and successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The supplied evidence does not establish active exploitation.
Executive priority
Treat as an urgent remediation item because exploitation could enable full compromise through a remotely reachable path requiring only low privileges. Prioritize exposed or broadly accessible ColdFusion systems. Escalate immediately if version matching is confirmed or suspicious activity is found.
Technical view
CVE-2026-48322 is a CWE-94 code-injection vulnerability with CVSS 3.1 score 9.9. It is network-accessible, low complexity, requires low privileges, and needs no user interaction. Scope changes, indicating impact may cross a security boundary. Arbitrary code executes in the current user's context.
Likely exposure
Exposure exists where the listed ColdFusion 2025 or 2023 versions are deployed and reachable by a low-privileged attacker. The bundle lists version values 0 and 11 for 2025, and 0 and 22 for 2023, but does not explain their exact range semantics. Confirm applicability against Adobe's advisory.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector supports remote, low-complexity exploitation by an attacker who already has low privileges, without user interaction. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle. No cited evidence here confirms public exploitation, exploit availability, or observed attacks.
Researcher notes
The bundle provides the vulnerability class, impact, CVSS vector, and ambiguous version entries, but no affected component, attack-path detail, indicators, exploit evidence, or explicit fix information. Researchers should use the CVE record and Adobe advisory to resolve version semantics and remediation details without assuming unsupported product configurations.
Mitigation direction
Review Adobe advisory APSB26-82 for the authoritative affected-version and remediation matrix.
Apply Adobe-recommended ColdFusion updates after appropriate testing.
Restrict ColdFusion access to trusted networks and necessary users while remediation is pending.
Reduce unnecessary low-privileged accounts and review their permissions.
Validation and detection
Inventory all ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 deployments and recorded update levels.
Compare each deployment directly with Adobe advisory APSB26-82.
Verify Adobe-recommended updates are installed and services operate normally.
Review relevant application and system logs for unexplained code execution or privilege-boundary activity.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-94 · source CWE mapping
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.