LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-48273: ColdFusion | Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') (CWE-95)

ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

CriticalCVSS 9.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This critical ColdFusion flaw may let a low-privileged, remote attacker run code with the application user’s permissions. No user interaction is required, and successful compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability beyond the vulnerable component.

Executive priority

Treat as an urgent remediation item because compromise could enable broad code execution with minimal attacker privileges. Prioritize internet-facing and business-critical ColdFusion systems, but avoid claiming compromise solely from vulnerability presence. Obtain Adobe’s version-specific guidance immediately.

Technical view

CVE-2026-48273 is a CWE-95 eval-injection vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 2025 and 2023. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and changed scope. The supplied affected-version data is ambiguous and should be confirmed against Adobe APSB26-119.

Likely exposure

Highest concern applies to listed ColdFusion 2025 or 2023 deployments reachable by untrusted networks or low-privileged users. Actual exposure depends on the affected functionality and precise version boundaries, which are not fully established by the supplied bundle.

Exploitation context

The record describes remote, low-complexity exploitation requiring low privileges but no user interaction. It reports arbitrary code execution as the current user. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle, and no supplied source confirms active exploitation or public exploit availability.

Researcher notes

The supplied record supports CWE-95, arbitrary code execution, low required privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope. It does not identify the vulnerable code path, prerequisites beyond low privileges, fixed versions, indicators of compromise, public proof-of-concept status, or observed exploitation. The normalized affected-version entries require vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Adobe APSB26-119 for authoritative affected versions, updates, and mitigations.
  • Apply Adobe’s prescribed ColdFusion update after appropriate change testing.
  • Restrict ColdFusion access to trusted networks and authorized users until remediation is verified.
  • Minimize the ColdFusion service account’s privileges and accessible resources.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 instances, including externally reachable and forgotten systems.
  • Compare each installed update level with Adobe APSB26-119’s affected and fixed versions.
  • Confirm the prescribed Adobe update is installed and survives service restart.
  • Review authentication, application, and system logs for suspicious activity around ColdFusion.
  • Verify network controls prevent unnecessary access to ColdFusion services.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-95: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-48273 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.16adobe

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-48273Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AdobeColdFusion 20250, 13unaffected
AdobeColdFusion 20230, 24unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-95 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.