CVE-2026-48273: ColdFusion | Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') (CWE-95)
ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This critical ColdFusion flaw may let a low-privileged, remote attacker run code with the application user’s permissions. No user interaction is required, and successful compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability beyond the vulnerable component.
Executive priority
Treat as an urgent remediation item because compromise could enable broad code execution with minimal attacker privileges. Prioritize internet-facing and business-critical ColdFusion systems, but avoid claiming compromise solely from vulnerability presence. Obtain Adobe’s version-specific guidance immediately.
Technical view
CVE-2026-48273 is a CWE-95 eval-injection vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 2025 and 2023. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.9: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and changed scope. The supplied affected-version data is ambiguous and should be confirmed against Adobe APSB26-119.
Likely exposure
Highest concern applies to listed ColdFusion 2025 or 2023 deployments reachable by untrusted networks or low-privileged users. Actual exposure depends on the affected functionality and precise version boundaries, which are not fully established by the supplied bundle.
Exploitation context
The record describes remote, low-complexity exploitation requiring low privileges but no user interaction. It reports arbitrary code execution as the current user. The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle, and no supplied source confirms active exploitation or public exploit availability.
Researcher notes
The supplied record supports CWE-95, arbitrary code execution, low required privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope. It does not identify the vulnerable code path, prerequisites beyond low privileges, fixed versions, indicators of compromise, public proof-of-concept status, or observed exploitation. The normalized affected-version entries require vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Review Adobe APSB26-119 for authoritative affected versions, updates, and mitigations.
Apply Adobe’s prescribed ColdFusion update after appropriate change testing.
Restrict ColdFusion access to trusted networks and authorized users until remediation is verified.
Minimize the ColdFusion service account’s privileges and accessible resources.
Validation and detection
Inventory all ColdFusion 2025 and 2023 instances, including externally reachable and forgotten systems.
Compare each installed update level with Adobe APSB26-119’s affected and fixed versions.
Confirm the prescribed Adobe update is installed and survives service restart.
Review authentication, application, and system logs for suspicious activity around ColdFusion.
Verify network controls prevent unnecessary access to ColdFusion services.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-95: Code execution behavior lookup
Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-95 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.