Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to issue unauthorized server-side requests, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-48259 is a critical Adobe Experience Manager SSRF issue. A low-privileged attacker can make the server send unauthorized requests without user interaction, with possible elevated access, account or session control, and code execution in the current user's context.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for any business-critical AEM environment. The rating is critical, no user interaction is required, and successful exploitation could affect sensitive data integrity and user account control.
Technical view
The vulnerability is CWE-918 SSRF in Adobe Experience Manager. CVSS 3.1 is 9.6 with network access, low attack complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality and integrity impact. Source data lists AEM as a Cloud Service, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM 6.5 as affected.
Likely exposure
Organizations using the listed Adobe Experience Manager products should assume potential exposure until their exact version and Adobe advisory status are verified. The source bundle does not provide deployment-specific prerequisites beyond low privileges and network attack vector.
Exploitation context
The source bundle says exploitation requires low privileges and no user interaction. It does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. No public exploit details are provided in the supplied evidence.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Adobe advisory reference. The bundle does not include exploit indicators, proof-of-concept status, or detailed patch mechanics. Avoid assuming exposure outside the named AEM products and versions.
Mitigation direction
Review Adobe APSB26-74 for the authoritative affected and fixed version guidance.
Apply Adobe-provided updates or hotfixes for the relevant AEM branch.
Inventory AEM as a Cloud Service, AEM 6.5 LTS, and AEM 6.5 deployments.
Restrict access to administrative and authoring surfaces where operationally possible.
Monitor Adobe guidance for revisions or additional mitigations.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed AEM product line and exact version against APSB26-74.
Verify whether listed hotfix identifiers apply to each affected deployment.
Review logs for unusual server-side outbound request patterns.
Check identity/session logs for unexpected privilege or account activity.
Confirm compensating network egress controls are documented and active.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-918 · source CWE mapping
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.