LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-48064: pam_usb: PAM_RHOST check skipped when deny_remote=false allows XDMCP authentication bypass

pam_usb provides hardware authentication for Linux using ordinary removable media. Prior to 0.9.1, when a PAM service is configured with deny_remote=false in pam_usb (commonly done for display managers such as gdm-password or lightdm to bypass process/TTY heuristics for local sessions), the PAM_RHOST check in pusb_do_auth() is also skipped. PAM_RHOST is set by remote daemons (sshd, XDMCP servers) to identify the remote client address. Because the check is gated inside if (opts.deny_remote), a genuine remote XDMCP connection reaches the USB device authentication step instead of being rejected. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.1.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

pam_usb before 0.9.1 can mishandle remote login checks when configured with deny_remote=false. That setting is commonly used for display managers, but it also skips the PAM_RHOST remote-client check, allowing a remote XDMCP authentication path to reach USB authentication instead of being rejected.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation where pam_usb protects interactive Linux logins and remote display access is enabled. This is high severity but currently lacks cited evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

In pusb_do_auth(), the PAM_RHOST check is gated behind opts.deny_remote. When deny_remote=false, remote-client detection is skipped. Sources describe this as an authentication bypass affecting mcdope pam_usb versions before 0.9.1, with CVSS 8.1 and CWE-863 improper authorization.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems using pam_usb before 0.9.1 with PAM services configured deny_remote=false, especially display-manager services such as gdm-password or lightdm where XDMCP remote authentication is enabled or reachable.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The described attack surface is network-reachable but high complexity, and the named remote path is XDMCP authentication.

Researcher notes

Focus on PAM service configuration and remote-session behavior. The core issue is authorization logic: disabling deny_remote also bypasses PAM_RHOST evaluation. Evidence is limited to the CVE record, GitHub advisory, and related issue.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade pam_usb to version 0.9.1 or later.
  • Review PAM services using pam_usb with deny_remote=false.
  • Disable or restrict XDMCP where it is not required.
  • Check vendor or distribution guidance for package availability.
  • Treat display-manager PAM changes as operationally sensitive.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed pam_usb versions across Linux endpoints and servers.
  • Inspect PAM configuration for pam_usb deny_remote=false entries.
  • Confirm whether XDMCP is enabled or externally reachable.
  • Verify upgraded systems report pam_usb 0.9.1 or later.
  • Review authentication logs for unusual remote display-manager attempts.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-48064 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-48064Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mcdopepam_usb< 0.9.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.