CVE-2026-47691: Netty has Insufficient Bailiwick Validation for NS Records
Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, Netty's `DnsResolveContext` insufficiently validates the bailiwick of NS records, enabling DNS Cache Poisoning. An attacker controlling an authoritative name server for a subdomain can poison the cache for parent domains (like `.co.uk`). In `io.netty.resolver.dns.DnsResolveContext.AuthoritativeNameServerList#add` method accepts any NS record from the AUTHORITY section as long as the record's name is a suffix of the questionName. Subsequently, the `handleWithAdditional` method caches the associated A records from the ADDITIONAL section directly into the `authoritativeDnsServerCache` under the parent domain's key. This bypasses standard bailiwick rules, where a server authoritative for a subdomain should not be trusted to provide authoritative records for its parent. The poisoned cache is then used for all future resolutions under the parent domain's key. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Netty can trust DNS records from a subdomain too broadly, allowing cache poisoning for a parent domain. A successful attack could redirect future name resolutions made by affected applications, creating confidentiality and integrity risk. The issue is patched in Netty 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority dependency update for internet-facing or DNS-dependent services using Netty. Business urgency is elevated because poisoned resolution can misdirect application traffic, but available evidence does not confirm active exploitation.
Technical view
Before 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, Netty DnsResolveContext insufficiently enforced bailiwick rules for NS records. It could cache ADDITIONAL-section A records into authoritativeDnsServerCache under a parent-domain key, letting a subdomain authoritative server influence future resolutions for that parent domain.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in Java applications or vendor products using vulnerable Netty resolver versions: below 4.1.135.Final, or 4.2.0.Final through before 4.2.15.Final.
Exploitation context
The provided sources describe a network attack with no privileges or user interaction, but high complexity. Evidence does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The attacker must control an authoritative name server for a subdomain and influence affected DNS resolution paths.
Researcher notes
Focus review on Netty DNS resolver usage and authoritativeDnsServerCache behavior. The key issue is accepting NS records based on suffix matching and caching associated A records for a broader parent-domain key, bypassing normal bailiwick trust boundaries.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Netty to 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final.
Apply vendor packages or Red Hat errata where Netty is bundled.
Check dependency overrides so vulnerable transitive Netty versions are not retained.
Restart affected services after updating to rebuild in-process resolver cache state.
Validation and detection
Inventory applications and products that include io.netty resolver components.
Compare resolved Netty versions against the affected version ranges.
Confirm lockfiles, SBOMs, or runtime libraries show a patched Netty version.
Review vendor advisories for packaged Netty fixes and product-specific status.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
12Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-345 · source CWE mapping
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Origin Validation Error represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.