LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-4740: Rhacm: open cluster management (ocm): cross-cluster privilege escalation via improper kubernetes client certificate renewal validation

A flaw was found in Open Cluster Management (OCM), the technology underlying Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (ACM). Improper validation of Kubernetes client certificate renewal allows a managed cluster administrator to forge a client certificate that can be approved by the OCM controller. This enables cross-cluster privilege escalation and may allow an attacker to gain control over other managed clusters, including the hub cluster.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An administrator of one managed Kubernetes cluster could abuse certificate renewal trust to gain privileges across other clusters, potentially including the central hub. A successful compromise could expose workloads, data, and cluster administration across the managed environment.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for environments where multiple sensitive clusters share an OCM or ACM hub. The prerequisite limits opportunistic attacks, but compromise of any managed-cluster administrator could expand into an estate-wide control event.

Technical view

OCM improperly validates Kubernetes client certificate renewals. A highly privileged managed-cluster user can forge a client certificate that the OCM controller may approve, enabling cross-cluster privilege escalation. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.2 with changed scope and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Likely exposure

Exposure concerns Red Hat Multicluster Engine registration components in listed 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, and 2.11 product lines. The bundle contains ambiguous version identifiers and marks several related packages unknown, so confirm exact affected builds with Red Hat.

Exploitation context

Exploitation requires high existing privileges on a managed cluster and no user interaction. The resulting access may cross security boundaries into peer clusters or the hub. The bundle states KEV is false and provides no evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

CWE-295 describes the certificate-validation weakness. Assessment should focus on renewal authorization, identity-to-cluster binding, and controller approval behavior. Avoid assuming every Multicluster Engine component is affected; the bundle explicitly leaves several package statuses unknown.

Mitigation direction

  • Review each listed Red Hat advisory for the update applicable to your deployed Multicluster Engine version.
  • Apply vendor-provided updates to affected registration components under normal change controls.
  • Restrict managed-cluster administrative privileges to essential personnel and service identities.
  • Monitor Red Hat guidance for components whose affected status remains unknown.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Multicluster Engine versions and registration package builds across hub and managed clusters.
  • Compare installed builds with the applicability and fixed-build information in the relevant Red Hat advisory.
  • Review certificate renewal and approval records for unexpected identities, subjects, or managed-cluster associations.
  • Audit recent hub and cross-cluster administrative activity originating from managed-cluster identities.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-4740 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
10Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.56redhat
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.56redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-4740Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  5. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  6. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  7. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPrhacm: Open Cluster Management (OCM): Cross-cluster privilege escalation via improper Kubernetes client certificate renewal validation
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-03-24T03:18:24.150Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-07T14:00:35.240Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red Hatmulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1multicluster-engine/registration-rhel9, 1776881164affected
Red Hatmulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11multicluster-engine/registration-rhel9, 1777478390affected
Red Hatmulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6multicluster-engine/registration-rhel9, 1775977180affected
Red Hatmulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8multicluster-engine/registration-rhel9, 1775638726affected
Red Hatmulticluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9multicluster-engine/registration-rhel9, 1776445095affected
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/addon-manager-rhel9unknown
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/maestro-rhel9unknown
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/managedcluster-import-controller-rhel9unknown
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/placement-rhel9unknown
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/registration-operator-rhel9unknown
Red HatMulticluster Engine for Kubernetesmulticluster-engine/work-rhel9unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-295 · source CWE mapping

Improper Certificate Validation

Improper Certificate Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.