LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-47099: TeleJSON < 6.0.0 DOM-based XSS via parse() Function

TeleJSON prior to 6.0.0 contains a DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability in the parse() function that allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript by delivering a crafted JSON payload containing a malicious _constructor-name_ property value. The custom reviver passes the constructor name directly to new Function() without sanitization when recreating object prototypes, enabling attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript through vectors such as postMessage in cross-frame communication contexts to achieve script execution within the application.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

TeleJSON before 6.0.0 can turn specially crafted JSON into JavaScript execution in a browser context. The business risk is session or data exposure in applications that parse untrusted data with this library. Evidence provided does not show known active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority client-side security update. Prioritize internet-facing applications, authenticated portals, and products handling sensitive browser-session data. Escalate if TeleJSON parses untrusted cross-frame or third-party supplied content.

Technical view

The issue is DOM-based XSS in TeleJSON parse(). A custom reviver uses a _constructor-name_ value while recreating object prototypes and passes it to new Function() without sanitization. CVSS is 6.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in browser-facing applications bundling storybookjs/telejson before 6.0.0 and parsing untrusted JSON, including cross-frame communication data such as postMessage. Server-only or development-only use may have different exposure and should be verified locally.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploitation can occur through crafted JSON delivered to parse(), with cross-frame communication listed as an example context. KEV is false, and no cited source in the bundle confirms active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the vendor advisory plus CVE metadata and third-party descriptions. The bundle does not include proof of exploitation or broader affected product claims beyond storybookjs/telejson prior to 6.0.0.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade TeleJSON to 6.0.0 or later where the library is used.
  • Review vendor advisory guidance before relying on compensating controls.
  • Avoid parsing untrusted cross-frame message data with vulnerable TeleJSON versions.
  • Inventory frontend bundles and lockfiles for vulnerable TeleJSON versions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm dependency trees do not include TeleJSON versions before 6.0.0.
  • Identify browser paths that call TeleJSON parse() on untrusted input.
  • Review postMessage handlers and frame integrations that feed parsed JSON.
  • Verify production bundles no longer include vulnerable TeleJSON code.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-47099 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7VulnCheck
2.1CVSS 4.0LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

2.1Low
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-47099Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
storybookjstelejson0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.