LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-4616: bolo-blog Article Title article cross site scripting

A security flaw has been discovered in bolo-blog up to 2.6.4. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /console/article/ of the component Article Title Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument articleTitle results in cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

MediumCVSS 4.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-4616 is a cross-site scripting issue in bolo-blog/bolo-solo article title handling through version 2.6.4. An authenticated high-privilege user can create a crafted article title that may run script when another user interacts with it. Public exploit information exists, but the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a near-term hygiene fix for affected sites, not an emergency unless many users have admin publishing access or the console is internet-exposed. Prioritize access restriction and vendor monitoring until a fix is confirmed.

Technical view

The flaw affects /console/article/ in the Article Title Handler. Manipulating the articleTitle argument can cause XSS. CVSS 4.0 is 4.8: network reachable, low complexity, high privileges required, and user interaction required. Listed weaknesses are CWE-79 and CWE-94, though the description primarily supports XSS.

Likely exposure

Organizations running bolo-blog or bolo-solo versions 2.6.0 through 2.6.4 are potentially exposed, especially if administrative article editing is available to multiple users or exposed over the internet.

Exploitation context

The issue is remotely triggerable and public exploit material is referenced. However, exploitation requires high privileges and user interaction, limiting broad opportunistic abuse. No CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation evidence was provided.

Researcher notes

Evidence comes from VulDB, CVE records, and a GitHub issue. The source bundle says the project was notified but has not responded. Do not assume a patched version exists from these sources. Public exploit availability increases validation urgency, but avoid weaponized testing.

Mitigation direction

  • Check official bolo-blog/bolo-solo guidance and issue #330 for maintainer updates.
  • Restrict access to /console/article/ to trusted administrators only.
  • Review who has article creation or editing privileges.
  • Consider disabling untrusted article title input until fixed.
  • Monitor for unexpected script-like content in article titles.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed bolo-blog or bolo-solo versions.
  • Identify any installations running 2.6.0 through 2.6.4.
  • Confirm whether /console/article/ is reachable externally.
  • Review recent article titles for suspicious HTML or script content.
  • Track the GitHub issue for patch or maintainer response.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-4616 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.8CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——VulDB
3.3CVSS 2.0LowAV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR6.42.9VulDB
2.4CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R0.91.4VulDB
2.4CVSS 3.0LowCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R0.91.4VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

4.8Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-4616Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/abolo-blog2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.6.4Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.