CVE-2026-45892: ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout
When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to
initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.
Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it
without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written
extent.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data
|<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized
ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but
ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack
of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data
ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with
EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and
leave an written extent from A to N.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent
status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out
the second part.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a Linux kernel ext4 filesystem bug where internal bookkeeping can wrongly remember part of a file extent as unwritten after the kernel has converted it. The public record does not state a business impact such as privilege escalation, data loss, or denial of service, so urgency depends on kernel exposure and vendor assessment.
Executive priority
Medium operational priority until severity is clarified: do not treat this as emergency exploitation, but include it in the next kernel patch cycle, especially for Linux systems storing critical data on ext4.
Technical view
The bug is in ext4 extent splitting when EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 are involved after a PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout. A failed split can zero the second range, then a later successful split updates on-disk extents but leaves a stale unwritten extent in the extent status tree. Stable kernel commits address this by dropping the cached extent status entry.
Likely exposure
Potential exposure is limited to Linux systems using ext4 with kernels containing the affected ext4 code path. The source bundle lists Linux kernel commit identifiers and version 6.1.167, but provides no distribution mapping, CPEs, or default affected product list beyond Linux.
Exploitation context
The CVE record does not report active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The source bundle does not provide exploitability details, attacker prerequisites, or a demonstrated security impact. Treat it as a kernel filesystem correctness issue until vendor advisories clarify impact and severity.
Researcher notes
Key evidence is the kernel description, not an external exploit report. The failure sequence involves ext4_split_extent_at temporary lack of space, zeroing B-to-N, then a successful A split that leaves stale extent status cache state. No CWE, CVSS, or exploit prerequisites are provided.
Mitigation direction
Check Linux vendor advisories for CVE-2026-45892 and mapped package versions.
Update kernels to versions containing the referenced stable ext4 fixes.
Prioritize systems that rely on ext4 for critical data workloads.
Avoid direct wrangler-style deployment assumptions; follow normal kernel maintenance controls.
Document any temporary risk acceptance where vendor fixes are not yet available.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions and ext4 usage across servers and images.
Compare installed kernels with vendor advisories and referenced stable commits.
Review package changelogs for CVE-2026-45892 or the ext4 fix title.
Confirm patched systems boot the expected kernel after maintenance.
Track whether vendors assign CVSS, severity, or distribution-specific impact.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2026-45892 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
May 27, 2026, 12:17 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.