CVE-2026-45186: In libexpat before 2.8.1, the computational complexity of attribute name collision checks allows a denial o...
In libexpat before 2.8.1, the computational complexity of attribute name collision checks allows a denial of service via moderately sized crafted XML input.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-45186 is a denial-of-service flaw in libexpat before 2.8.1. Crafted XML with attribute-name collisions can make parsing consume excessive CPU, potentially slowing or stopping services that accept XML from untrusted sources.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or partner-facing XML processing services. This is a high availability issue with easy remote triggering per CVSS, but current bundle evidence does not show active exploitation or confidentiality impact.
Technical view
The issue is classified as CWE-407: inefficient algorithmic complexity. Attribute name collision checks in libexpat before 2.8.1 can be driven into costly computation by moderately sized crafted XML input. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5, network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, availability impact only.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely where applications, middleware, appliances, or OS packages use libexpat to parse attacker-supplied XML. The bundle names libexpat before 2.8.1 and includes Red Hat errata plus a Siemens advisory reference, indicating downstream vendor tracking.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not state active exploitation, and KEV is false. The described attack is remote denial of service through crafted XML, not code execution or data theft. Evidence supports availability risk, but not weaponized exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
The CVE text centers on attribute-name collision complexity in libexpat before 2.8.1. The provided affected metadata is sparse and partly inconsistent with the description, so product scope should be confirmed through vendor advisories rather than inferred.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade libexpat to 2.8.1 or later where available.
Apply relevant vendor advisories for packaged or embedded libexpat.
Check Red Hat errata for affected supported platforms.
Review Siemens advisory if using Siemens products.
Limit or reject untrusted XML where upgrades are pending.
Monitor vendor guidance for product-specific fixes.
Validation and detection
Inventory direct and transitive libexpat usage.
Confirm deployed libexpat versions are 2.8.1 or later.
Identify services that parse externally supplied XML.
Check OS vendor security advisories against installed packages.
Review dependency scanners for CVE-2026-45186 findings.
Validate remediation in staging before production rollout.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-407: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.