LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-45109: Next.js: Middleware / Proxy bypass in App Router applications via segment-prefetch routes

Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. From 15.2.0 to before 15.5.18 and 16.2.6, it was found that the fix addressing CVE-2026-44575 did not apply to middleware.ts with Turbopack. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.5.18 and 16.2.6.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in certain Next.js App Router deployments can let an unauthenticated remote request bypass middleware-based protections, potentially exposing confidential information. Risk is highest where middleware.ts enforces authentication or access control and the application uses Turbopack. The supplied severity is High, with no user interaction required.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent patching item for public applications matching the affected configuration, especially where middleware protects sensitive customer, administrative, or tenant data. Rapidly identify exposed deployments and upgrade them. Lower priority only after configuration evidence shows the vulnerable middleware and Turbopack path is absent.

Technical view

CVE-2026-45109 is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-44575 affecting middleware.ts under Turbopack. Segment-prefetch routes may avoid expected middleware processing in affected Next.js App Router applications. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5, reflecting network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and high confidentiality impact without stated integrity or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Prioritize internet-facing Next.js applications using affected 15.x or 16.x releases, the App Router, Turbopack, and middleware.ts for security decisions. Applications not using this combination may not be exploitable, but the supplied sources do not provide enough configuration detail to categorically exclude them.

Exploitation context

The source bundle marks this CVE as absent from CISA KEV, and no supplied source supports active exploitation. That does not establish that exploitation is impossible or has never occurred. The network-accessible, unauthenticated, low-complexity rating makes exposed vulnerable deployments attractive targets.

Researcher notes

The bundle contains a 15.x version inconsistency: its affected range ends before 15.5.17, while the description says releases before 15.5.18 are affected and names 15.5.18 as fixed. Conservatively treat 15.5.17 as potentially affected and use 15.5.18 or later unless Vercel clarifies otherwise. The stated 16.x fixed release is 16.2.6.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade 15.x deployments to Next.js 15.5.18 or later.
  • Upgrade 16.x deployments to Next.js 16.2.6 or later.
  • Prioritize applications whose middleware enforces authentication, authorization, tenancy, or confidentiality boundaries.
  • Consult the Vercel advisory for deployment-specific guidance and any subsequently published mitigations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Next.js versions from manifests, lockfiles, build artifacts, and deployed application metadata.
  • Confirm whether each application uses the App Router, Turbopack, and middleware.ts.
  • Identify protected routes whose access decisions depend on middleware execution.
  • After upgrading, run authorized regression tests confirming middleware protections apply across supported route and prefetch behavior.
  • Review access logs for unexpected requests or responses involving protected App Router content.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-288: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-358: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-45109 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6GitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-45109Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPnext.js: Next.js: Information disclosure via security fix bypass in middleware with Turbopack
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-13T18:01:23.402Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-13T17:11:07.275Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vercelnext.js>= 15.2.0, < 15.5.17, >= 16.0.0, < 16.2.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-288 · source CWE mapping

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-358 · source CWE mapping

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard

Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.