CVE-2026-45018: Chainlit: Command injection via MCP stdio transport allows unauthenticated remote code execution
Chainlit is a Python framework for building production-ready conversational AI applications. From 2.4.0rc0 until 2.12.0, Chainlit deployments with features.mcp.enabled set to true in .chainlit/config.toml expose the POST /mcp endpoint without requiring authentication. For stdio transport, the endpoint accepts a user-controlled fullCommand string. The validate_mcp_command() function in backend/chainlit/mcp.py checks only the executable name against config.features.mcp.stdio.allowed_executables and passes unchecked arguments to StdioServerParameters in backend/chainlit/server.py. Because npx supports the -c argument, an attacker can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the Chainlit process. If allowed_executables is unset, its None default is treated as allowing every executable. This issue is fixed in version 2.12.0.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Affected Chainlit applications can let anyone who reaches the MCP endpoint run operating-system commands without logging in. Successful exploitation would give the attacker the Chainlit process’s privileges, potentially exposing data, altering systems, or interrupting service. Exposure requires an affected version with MCP enabled and the stdio transport path available.
Executive priority
Prioritize immediate remediation for exposed production deployments because compromise requires no credentials or user action and can affect the entire host context available to Chainlit. Upgrade urgently, restrict endpoint access during rollout, and verify configuration across every environment. Lower urgency only after confirming MCP is disabled or the affected endpoint is unreachable.
Technical view
Chainlit versions 2.4.0rc0 through 2.11.x expose an unauthenticated POST /mcp endpoint when features.mcp.enabled is true. For stdio transport, validation checks only the executable name while forwarding attacker-controlled arguments. Permitted tools such as npx can interpret those arguments as shell commands. An unset allowed_executables value permits every executable. Version 2.12.0 fixes the issue.
Likely exposure
Internet-accessible or otherwise untrusted-accessible Chainlit deployments are most exposed when running versions >=2.4.0rc0 and <2.12.0 with MCP enabled. Risk is especially direct where stdio transport is usable, npx is allowed, or allowed_executables is unset. Deployments without MCP enabled are not described as affected by this path.
Exploitation context
The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8: network-accessible, low complexity, unauthenticated, and requiring no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The supplied record does not identify known active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Treat exploit activity as unconfirmed.
Researcher notes
This is CWE-78 command injection caused by incomplete validation across the MCP request and process-launch boundary. Executable-name allowlisting does not safely constrain interpreter-like arguments. The None default broadens exposure by allowing all executables. Assess process identity, accessible secrets, filesystem permissions, and connected services to estimate blast radius. No active exploitation evidence is supplied.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Chainlit to version 2.12.0 or later.
Disable features.mcp.enabled until the upgrade is complete if MCP is unnecessary.
Restrict untrusted network access to POST /mcp while remediation is pending.
Review vendor guidance before relying on executable allowlisting as a compensating control.
Validation and detection
Inventory Chainlit versions and identify deployments below 2.12.0.
Inspect .chainlit/config.toml for features.mcp.enabled set to true.
Determine whether POST /mcp is reachable from untrusted networks without authentication.
Review stdio configuration for npx or an unset allowed_executables value.
After upgrading, confirm the deployed runtime reports version 2.12.0 or later.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-78 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.