LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-44893: Netty: HAProxy SSL TLV parsing leaks retained slice on invalid TLV length

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In netty-codec-haproxy prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, when decoding a PP2_TYPE_SSL TLV, HAProxyMessage.readNextTLV() first calls `header.retainedSlice(header.readerIndex(), length)` and only then reads the 1-byte client field and 4-byte verify field. If the attacker sets the TLV length below 5, the subsequent readByte/readInt throws IndexOutOfBoundsException. HAProxyMessageDecoder only catches HAProxyProtocolException around this call, so the IOOBE propagates and the retained slice on the pooled cumulation buffer is never released. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in the Netty networking library's HAProxy protocol decoder lets a remote attacker send a malformed message that leaks memory on the server. Repeated abuse can exhaust resources and crash applications that trust upstream proxy headers, disrupting availability of services built on Netty.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patch cycle for internet-facing or partner-facing services that speak PROXY protocol v2. Not a fire drill: no known exploitation and impact is availability only, but the fix is well-defined and vendor advisories are already flowing.

Technical view

In netty-codec-haproxy before 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, HAProxyMessage.readNextTLV() retains a slice of the pooled cumulation buffer before reading the client and verify fields of a PP2_TYPE_SSL TLV. A TLV length under 5 triggers IndexOutOfBoundsException, which HAProxyMessageDecoder does not catch, so the retained slice is never released. Repeated crafted frames drive a memory leak and availability loss.

Likely exposure

Any service using netty-codec-haproxy to terminate or parse PROXY protocol v2 with SSL TLVs from an upstream load balancer or peer. Exposure widens if the PROXY-speaking endpoint is reachable by untrusted clients or if upstream proxies do not sanitize TLV lengths.

Exploitation context

Not listed in CISA KEV and no public reports of active exploitation are cited in the bundle. CVSS 3.1 base 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/A:H) reflects a network-reachable, unauthenticated availability impact. Red Hat has issued multiple vendor advisories (RHSA-2026:26017/26018/26586/34608/36820/37390), indicating meaningful downstream reach.

Researcher notes

Root cause is missing release of a retainedSlice when readByte/readInt overrun a short PP2_TYPE_SSL TLV; HAProxyMessageDecoder only catches HAProxyProtocolException, letting IndexOutOfBoundsException escape with the slice still held. CWE-703 and CWE-805 apply. Confirm reachability of the HAProxyMessageDecoder in your pipeline before prioritizing; services that do not enable PROXY protocol are not affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade netty-codec-haproxy to 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final across all services and container images.
  • Apply Red Hat RHSA-2026:26017, 26018, 26586, 34608, 36820, and 37390 to affected platforms.
  • Restrict PROXY protocol endpoints so only trusted load balancers can send PP2 TLVs.
  • Consult vendor advisories for downstream products that embed Netty until first-party fixes ship.
  • Add capacity and memory alerts on Netty-based services to catch leak-driven degradation early.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Java services and dependencies for netty-codec-haproxy versions using SCA or dependency scans.
  • Confirm upgraded builds resolve to 4.1.135.Final or 4.2.15.Final and redeploy.
  • Verify Red Hat patched RPMs are installed on affected RHEL and middleware hosts.
  • Review network policy to ensure PROXY protocol listeners are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Monitor direct memory and pooled buffer metrics after deploy to confirm no residual leak.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-703: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-805: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-44893 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
13Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6GitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-44893Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPnetty-codec-haproxy: Netty-codec-haproxy: Denial of Service via malformed HAProxy message
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-06-12T15:01:18.066Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-06-12T14:00:25.801Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
nettynetty>= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.15.Final, < 4.1.135.FinalListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-703 · source CWE mapping

Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions

Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-805 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value

Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.