LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-44422: FreeRDP RDPEAR NDR ref-id aliasing causes client-side UAF/double-free and type confusion

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.26.0, FreeRDP's RDPEAR NDR parser accepts one non-null NDR pointer ref-id for multiple logical pointer fields without tracking the pointed object's expected NDR type or ownership. When the same ref-id is reused across two pointer fields, the parser assigns the same heap object to both output fields. The generic destructor later walks each field independently and destroys/frees both pointers. This causes a malicious-server-triggerable heap use-after-free / double-free in the FreeRDP client's RDPEAR authentication-redirection path. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.26.0.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious RDP server can trigger memory corruption in vulnerable FreeRDP clients during authentication redirection. The issue affects FreeRDP before 3.26.0. Successful exploitation requires a user to connect the client to a malicious or compromised server, but impact can include confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority client-side patching issue for teams using FreeRDP. Prioritize exposed operator workstations and support environments that connect to untrusted RDP targets.

Technical view

FreeRDP's RDPEAR NDR parser can reuse one non-null pointer ref-id across multiple logical pointer fields without tracking type or ownership. The same heap object can be assigned to multiple outputs, then independently destroyed, causing use-after-free, double-free, and type confusion in the client authentication-redirection path.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on workstations, jump hosts, or support systems running FreeRDP clients below 3.26.0, especially where users connect to third-party, unmanaged, or potentially compromised RDP servers.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The attack is network-reachable from a malicious server but requires user interaction and has high attack complexity under CVSS 3.1.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on RDPEAR authentication-redirection code paths and NDR pointer alias handling. The key condition is reuse of one ref-id across fields with different ownership or expected type.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FreeRDP to 3.26.0 or later.
  • Apply relevant vendor or distribution updates, including Red Hat advisories where applicable.
  • Restrict FreeRDP use to trusted RDP servers until patched.
  • Review vendor guidance for any environment-specific mitigations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed FreeRDP versions on endpoints and servers.
  • Confirm packaged FreeRDP builds include the 3.26.0 fix or vendor backport.
  • Identify users or systems connecting to external or unmanaged RDP servers.
  • Check vulnerability scanners and SBOMs for FreeRDP versions below 3.26.0.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-825: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-44422 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.65.9GitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.65.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-44422Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPfreerdp: FreeRDP: Arbitrary code execution or denial of service via heap use-after-free in RDPEAR NDR parser
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-29T21:01:10.766Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-29T19:41:46.829Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FreeRDPFreeRDP< 3.26.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-415 · source CWE mapping

Double Free

Double Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-825 · source CWE mapping

Expired Pointer Dereference

Expired Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.