LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-44420: FreeRDP cliprdr server heap-buffer-overflow via undersized capabilitySetLength in CB_CLIP_CAPS

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.26.0, a malicious RDP client can trigger a heap-buffer-overflow write in FreeRDP's server-side clipboard (cliprdr) channel by sending a CB_CLIP_CAPS PDU with a too-small capabilitySetLength. This can crash the server process (remote DoS) and may be exploitable for code execution because it corrupts heap memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.26.0.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious RDP client can send a malformed clipboard message to a vulnerable FreeRDP server, corrupting server memory. This can remotely crash the service and might enable code execution, although code execution has not been confirmed. FreeRDP versions before 3.26.0 are affected.

Executive priority

Treat this as an expedited high-priority update for exposed FreeRDP servers. The vulnerability is remotely reachable by a client and can disrupt service, with potentially greater impact if code execution proves practical. Prioritize internet-facing, shared, or otherwise untrusted-client environments. Current evidence does not justify describing it as actively exploited or critical.

Technical view

FreeRDP before 3.26.0 insufficiently validates capabilitySetLength while parsing a CB_CLIP_CAPS PDU in the server-side cliprdr channel. An undersized value can cause a heap-buffer-overflow write. CVSS 3.1 rates it 8.8 with network reachability, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and potentially severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to FreeRDP versions below 3.26.0 where server-side clipboard-channel processing is reachable by RDP clients. Risk is highest for servers accepting connections from untrusted or low-privileged clients. Client-only deployments may not expose the described server-side path; confirm actual roles and configuration.

Exploitation context

The supplied record does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Remote denial of service is supported by the described crash condition. Code execution is considered possible because heap memory is overwritten, but no cited source confirms successful code execution. The cpp-httplib advisory is unrelated and does not support exploitation claims for FreeRDP.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on bounds handling for capabilitySetLength in CB_CLIP_CAPS parsing and the affected server-side cliprdr path. CWE-122 and CWE-131 describe the heap overwrite and size-calculation weaknesses. Avoid treating the unrelated cpp-httplib advisory's exploit tag as evidence. Public evidence supplied here does not confirm a working exploit or code-execution outcome.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade upstream FreeRDP to version 3.26.0 or later.
  • Apply supported distribution updates, including applicable Red Hat errata.
  • Until patched, restrict RDP server access to trusted clients and networks.
  • Consult current vendor guidance if an immediate upgrade is unavailable.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FreeRDP packages and confirm their effective versions.
  • Identify deployments operating as RDP servers with server-side clipboard processing.
  • Verify remediation provides FreeRDP 3.26.0 or the distribution's backported fix.
  • Retest expected RDP and clipboard workflows after updating.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-131: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-44420 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
8Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9GitHub_M
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-44420Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPfreerdp: FreeRDP: Arbitrary code execution and denial of service via heap-buffer-overflow
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-29T21:01:57.327Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-29T19:42:23.460Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FreeRDPFreeRDP< 3.26.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-131 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size

Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.