CVE-2026-44417: Apache CXF: Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-48913 (Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE)
The fix for CVE-2025-48913: Apache CXF: Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE was not complete, meaning that another path in the code might lead to code execution capabilities, if untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF.
Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.1, 4.1.6 or 3.6.11, which fix this issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Apache CXF has an incomplete prior fix where untrusted JMS configuration may still lead to code execution. The business risk is highest for applications that let non-administrators or tenants influence JMS settings. Apache recommends upgrading to fixed CXF versions.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority where Apache CXF JMS configuration can be influenced by untrusted users. For environments without CXF JMS or without delegated configuration, urgency is lower but inventory and upgrade planning are still warranted.
Technical view
CVE-2026-44417 is an incomplete fix for CVE-2025-48913 in Apache CXF JMS transport. If untrusted users can configure JMS for CXF, another code path may allow code execution. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5 with network access, low privileges, high complexity, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to Apache CXF deployments using JMS transport, especially org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms, where JMS configuration is user-controlled or tenant-controlled. Systems without CXF JMS usage, or where only trusted administrators control JMS configuration, appear less exposed based on the provided sources.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires low privileges and no user interaction, but has high attack complexity and depends on untrusted JMS configuration being permitted.
Researcher notes
The key condition is not simply CXF presence; it is CXF JMS configuration exposed to untrusted users. The provided affected-version data is sparse, but fixed versions are explicit. Avoid assuming exploitability without confirming JMS transport usage and configuration control boundaries.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Apache CXF to 4.2.1, 4.1.6, or 3.6.11.
Inventory uses of org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms across applications.
Remove untrusted user control over JMS configuration.
Review Apache and Red Hat advisories for distribution-specific guidance.
Prioritize externally reachable or tenant-configurable CXF services first.
Validation and detection
Check SBOMs and dependency manifests for Apache CXF JMS transport.
Confirm deployed CXF versions are 4.2.1, 4.1.6, 3.6.11, or later fixed releases.
Review application roles that can create or modify JMS configuration.
Verify no public or tenant workflow can supply JMS settings.
Track Red Hat errata applicability for packaged deployments.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-15: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.