CVE-2026-44232: dssrf: every IPv6 category bypasses is_url_safe
DSSRF is a Node.js library that provides a wide range of utilities and advanced SSRF defense checks. Prior to 1.0.3, every IPv6 category bypasses is_url_safe. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.3.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-44232 affects dssrf-js, a Node.js library used to help prevent server-side request forgery. Versions before 1.0.3 can incorrectly mark IPv6 URLs as safe, allowing protections to be bypassed. Organizations using this library for URL safety checks should prioritize upgrading.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for applications using dssrf-js in SSRF defenses. Upgrade during the next urgent security maintenance window, sooner for internet-facing services handling user-supplied URLs.
Technical view
In HackingRepo dssrf-js before 1.0.3, every IPv6 category bypasses the is_url_safe check. The CVE is rated high with CVSS 4.0 score 8.7 and network, unauthenticated, no-user-interaction attack conditions. The issue is fixed in version 1.0.3.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely where Node.js applications use dssrf-js versions below 1.0.3 and rely on is_url_safe to validate user-controlled URLs, especially IPv6-formatted destinations.
Exploitation context
The public sources do not state active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The risk is that IPv6 inputs may bypass SSRF safety logic that applications trust.
Researcher notes
Available public detail is limited to the advisory and CVE metadata. Validate impact by reviewing dependency versions and code paths using is_url_safe. Do not assume unrelated DSSRF functions are affected without vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade dssrf-js to version 1.0.3 or later.
Review the GitHub security advisory for vendor guidance.
Prioritize applications that validate user-supplied URLs with dssrf-js.
Rebuild and redeploy services after dependency updates.
Validation and detection
Inventory Node.js projects for dssrf-js dependency usage.
Confirm installed or locked versions are 1.0.3 or later.
Search application code for reliance on is_url_safe.
Run regression tests covering IPv6 URL validation behavior.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-791: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-791 · source CWE mapping
Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements
Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.