LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-43997: vm2: Sandbox Escape

vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.0, it is possible to obtain the host Object. There are various ways to use the host Object, to escape the sandbox, one example would be using HostObject.getOwnPropertySymbols to obtain Symbol(nodejs.util.inspect.custom). This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.0.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Applications using vm2 to run untrusted JavaScript may not be safely isolated. An attacker able to submit code to the sandbox could reach the host environment, potentially compromising sensitive data, application integrity, and service availability. vm2 versions before 3.11.0 are affected.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate remediation priority for any reachable untrusted-code execution service. Rapidly identify affected deployments, upgrade them, and constrain host privileges. Systems containing vm2 but lacking an untrusted input path remain affected by version, although their practical exposure may be lower.

Technical view

CVE-2026-43997 is a vm2 sandbox escape caused by access to the host Object. The advisory identifies host-object property-symbol handling as one route across the isolation boundary. The CVSS 3.1 score is 10.0, reflecting remotely reachable, low-complexity compromise without privileges or user interaction when an exposed application accepts untrusted code.

Likely exposure

Exposure is highest where vm2 versions below 3.11.0 execute user-controlled or externally supplied JavaScript. Dependency presence alone does not prove reachability; teams must determine whether untrusted input can enter a vm2 sandbox and what host permissions the Node.js process holds.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources describe a practical sandbox-escape condition, but do not establish active exploitation in the wild. The CVE is not identified as a CISA KEV entry in the supplied bundle. Treat reachable deployments as urgent because successful exploitation could cross the intended trust boundary with broad impact.

Researcher notes

The assigned weaknesses include CWE-653 and CWE-94. The central security failure is loss of separation between sandboxed JavaScript and host objects. Researchers should assess application-specific reachability and host-process privilege without testing production destructively. The supplied evidence confirms the affected range and fixed release, but not observed exploitation or every possible escape path.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade vm2 to version 3.11.0 or later.
  • Prioritize internet-facing services that execute untrusted JavaScript.
  • Disable untrusted-code execution until upgrading if immediate remediation is impossible.
  • Reduce the Node.js process permissions and access to secrets.
  • Review applicable Red Hat guidance for packaged dependencies.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory direct and transitive vm2 installations and record resolved versions.
  • Confirm no deployed instance resolves to a version below 3.11.0.
  • Trace whether external input can reach vm2 code-execution paths.
  • Verify upgraded services start correctly and retain required sandbox behavior.
  • Review logs for suspicious activity around sandbox execution interfaces.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-653: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-43997 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96GitHub_M
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

10Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-43997Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPvm2: vm2: Arbitrary code execution via sandbox escape
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-13T18:02:02.030Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-13T17:17:54.869Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
patriksimekvm2< 3.11.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-653 · source CWE mapping

Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization

Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.