Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift.
This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Apache Thrift before 0.23.0 could incorrectly accept a TLS certificate whose hostname does not match the server. That weakens the trust check applications rely on for encrypted connections and can expose data or service integrity if traffic is intercepted or redirected.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for services using Apache Thrift over TLS, especially where traffic crosses untrusted networks. The fix path is clear: upgrade to 0.23.0 or vendor-provided patched packages.
Technical view
The issue is improper certificate validation with host mismatch in Apache Thrift TSSLTransportFactory.java. It is classified as CWE-295 and CWE-297, affects Apache Thrift before 0.23.0, and has CVSS 3.1 score 7.3 with network attack vector and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in Java applications or services using Apache Thrift TLS transports with versions before 0.23.0. Downstream packaged products may also be affected, as indicated by multiple Red Hat advisories, but product-specific impact must be confirmed against vendor notices.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The practical risk is TLS endpoint impersonation where hostname validation matters. No public exploit steps or weaponized guidance are included in the provided sources.
Researcher notes
Evidence is strongest for version scope and remediation, but limited on root-cause detail and downstream package impact. Do not assume exploitation or affected products beyond Apache Thrift before 0.23.0 and vendor advisories listed in the source bundle.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade Apache Thrift to version 0.23.0 or later.
Review Red Hat advisories for affected packaged dependencies.
Prioritize internet-facing or cross-network Thrift clients using TLS.
Check vendor guidance before applying product-specific fixes.
Monitor Apache and distribution advisories for follow-up changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory applications and SBOMs for Apache Thrift versions before 0.23.0.
Identify Java code paths using TSSLTransportFactory or Thrift TLS transports.
Confirm deployed artifacts include Apache Thrift 0.23.0 or later.
Map Red Hat package advisories to installed products and versions.
Review TLS integration tests for hostname mismatch rejection behavior.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-295: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.