LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-43640: Bitwarden Server < 2026.4.1 Authentication Bypass via SCIM API Key

Bitwarden Server prior to v2026.4.1 does not require master-password re-authentication when retrieving or rotating an organization's SCIM API key, allowing an authenticated user with SCIM management privileges to obtain the key using only a valid session.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Bitwarden Server before v2026.4.1 could let a signed-in user with SCIM management privileges retrieve or rotate an organization's SCIM API key without re-entering their master password. This weakens a sensitive control around identity provisioning secrets and could expose high-value organizational access paths.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for self-hosted Bitwarden Server environments using SCIM. This is high severity because it concerns access to provisioning secrets, but the known precondition is an authenticated user with specific privileges.

Technical view

The flaw is an authentication bypass in Bitwarden Server's SCIM API key retrieval or rotation flow. Sources state master-password re-authentication was not required, so a valid authenticated session with SCIM management privileges could access the organization's SCIM API key. CVSS v4.0 score is 8.6 high.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running Bitwarden Server before v2026.4.1 where users have SCIM management privileges. The provided sources do not establish impact for Bitwarden cloud, non-server deployments, or environments without SCIM management use.

Exploitation context

Public technical analysis is referenced, but the bundle does not state active exploitation and KEV is false. Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session and SCIM management privileges, not unauthenticated internet access.

Researcher notes

The key research point is the missing master-password re-authentication gate around SCIM API key access. Evidence supports a privilege-scoped authentication bypass, not unauthenticated compromise. Do not assume active exploitation without further source confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Bitwarden Server to v2026.4.1 or later.
  • Review Bitwarden's v2026.4.1 release notes and patch details.
  • Restrict SCIM management privileges to users who require them.
  • Check vendor guidance before rotating keys or changing SCIM integrations.
  • Review privileged session security for affected organizations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Bitwarden Server instances and record deployed versions.
  • Confirm whether each instance is older than v2026.4.1.
  • Identify organizations using SCIM management features.
  • Review which users hold SCIM management privileges.
  • Check administrative logs for SCIM key retrieval or rotation activity.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-303: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-43640 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.85.2VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-43640Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
bitwardenserver0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-303 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm

Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.