LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-43618: Rsync < 3.4.3 Integer Overflow Information Disclosure

Rsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain an integer overflow vulnerability in the compressed-token decoder where a 32-bit signed counter is not checked for overflow, allowing a malicious sender to trigger an overflow that causes the receiver process to read and return data from outside the intended buffer bounds. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to disclose process memory contents including environment variables, passwords, heap and stack data, and library memory pointers, significantly reducing ASLR effectiveness and facilitating further exploitation.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Rsync 3.4.2 and earlier can leak memory from a receiving rsync process when processing malicious compressed transfer data. Leaked memory may include secrets, environment variables, stack or heap data, and pointers that weaken ASLR. Treat exposed rsync workflows involving untrusted senders as urgent.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for externally reachable or partner-facing rsync services. Memory disclosure can expose operational secrets and make later compromise easier, even though active exploitation is not confirmed in the supplied evidence.

Technical view

The issue is an integer overflow in rsync's compressed-token decoder. An unchecked 32-bit signed counter can wrap, causing the receiver to read and return data outside intended buffer bounds. Sources map this to CWE-125 and CWE-190 with CVSS 8.1, confidentiality high and availability high.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is rsync 3.4.2 or earlier where a receiver processes sender-controlled transfer data. Internet-facing rsync services, backup pipelines, mirrors, and automation accepting low-privileged or external senders deserve priority review.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation. The described attack requires a malicious sender able to interact with a vulnerable receiver; no weaponized exploit details are needed to assess risk.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports an out-of-bounds read caused by integer overflow in compressed-token decoding. The source bundle does not provide proof-of-concept status, detailed affected platform matrices beyond rsync 3.4.2 and earlier, or non-rsync product impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade rsync to version 3.4.3 where available.
  • Apply relevant vendor backport updates, including applicable Red Hat errata.
  • Restrict rsync access to trusted senders until patched.
  • Review vendor guidance for distribution-specific fixed package versions.
  • Reduce exposure of public rsync services where business permits.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory rsync versions across servers, containers, appliances, and backup hosts.
  • Identify rsync receivers processing data from external or low-privileged senders.
  • Confirm fixed package status against vendor advisories or rsync 3.4.3 release notes.
  • Review recent rsync service logs for unexpected sender activity.
  • Verify remediation through package metadata, not only upstream version strings.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-43618 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

3CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
11Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

3 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H2.85.2VulnCheck
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9redhat-SADP
6.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-43618Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPrsync: rsync: Remote memory disclosure via integer overflow in compressed-token decoding
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-11T13:09:39.838Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
RsyncProjectrsync0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-125 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Read

Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.