CVE-2026-43215: cifs: Fix locking usage for tcon fields
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cifs: Fix locking usage for tcon fields
We used to use the cifs_tcp_ses_lock to protect a lot of objects
that are not just the server, ses or tcon lists. We later introduced
srv_lock, ses_lock and tc_lock to protect fields within the
corresponding structs. This was done to provide a more granular
protection and avoid unnecessary serialization.
There were still a couple of uses of cifs_tcp_ses_lock to provide
tcon fields. In this patch, I've replaced them with tc_lock.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A Linux CIFS client locking flaw could allow unsafe access to connection fields. The supplied CVSS assessment rates potential confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact as high, but the public description does not explain the failure mode or practical attack sequence.
Executive priority
Prioritize timely remediation on servers and endpoints that actively use CIFS, especially business-critical file workflows. Broader emergency action is not supported by the available exploitation evidence. Require owners to confirm exposure because the supplied version records are ambiguous.
Technical view
The CIFS code protected some tree-connection (tcon) fields with the broad cifs_tcp_ses_lock after dedicated tc_lock protection had been introduced. The fix replaces those remaining lock uses with tc_lock. The bundle does not identify a CWE, specific race outcome, trigger, or demonstrated security impact.
Likely exposure
Treat systems using Linux CIFS/SMB client functionality as potentially exposed when their kernels match the supplied affected records. The version data is not expressed as a clear range, so package-level exposure requires confirmation through distribution guidance or fix-commit ancestry.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector describes network access, low complexity, no privileges, and required user interaction. However, the bundle provides no attack scenario, proof of concept, or evidence of active exploitation. The CVE is not marked as included in KEV.
Researcher notes
The security rationale appears to involve incorrect synchronization of tcon fields, but the sources do not document the vulnerable interleaving, affected fields, resulting corruption, or attacker-controlled conditions. Stable commits are available for ancestry analysis. Avoid inferring remote code execution or a specific memory-safety class from CVSS alone.
Mitigation direction
Update to a vendor-supported kernel incorporating the applicable referenced stable fix.
Consult Linux distribution guidance to map the upstream records to packaged kernel versions.
Prioritize systems actively using CIFS mounts while package-level exposure is confirmed.
Validation and detection
Inventory running kernel versions and identify systems using CIFS modules or mounts.
Confirm the installed kernel includes the applicable fix commit or distribution backport.
Reboot updated systems and verify the corrected kernel is running.
Regression-test required CIFS mounts and connection workflows after updating.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2026-43215 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.