LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-43091: xfrm: Wait for RCU readers during policy netns exit

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: Wait for RCU readers during policy netns exit xfrm_policy_fini() frees the policy_bydst hash tables after flushing the policy work items and deleting all policies, but it does not wait for concurrent RCU readers to leave their read-side critical sections first. The policy_bydst tables are published via rcu_assign_pointer() and are looked up through rcu_dereference_check(), so netns teardown must also wait for an RCU grace period before freeing the table memory. Fix this by adding synchronize_rcu() before freeing the policy hash tables.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Linux kernel race can free IPsec policy hash tables while another kernel task is still reading them during network-namespace shutdown. A local, low-privileged user may be able to trigger memory corruption, potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The supplied CVSS score is 7.8.

Executive priority

Schedule expedited remediation, especially for shared Linux infrastructure and hosts accessible by untrusted local users. Internet-only exposure is not supported by the supplied evidence, so prioritize by local-access and container-isolation risk. Confirm exact vendor package status because the supplied version list is incomplete or ambiguous.

Technical view

xfrm_policy_fini() flushes work and deletes policies but frees policy_bydst tables without first waiting for existing RCU readers. Because those tables are RCU-published and dereferenced, teardown can race with readers. The upstream resolution adds synchronize_rcu() before freeing the tables. The bundle does not establish reliable exploitation or specific attack outcomes.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to Linux systems where low-privileged local users can cause network-namespace and XFRM policy lifecycle activity, including some containerized or multi-tenant hosts. The supplied affected-version data is ambiguous and should not be treated as complete range notation. Confirm exposure through distribution or kernel-vendor advisories and backport records.

Exploitation context

The CVSS vector indicates local access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and potentially high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. However, the bundle provides no public exploit evidence, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Treat exploitation status as unconfirmed rather than active.

Researcher notes

The core condition is an RCU lifetime violation during XFRM policy network-namespace teardown. Five stable-kernel commits are referenced, apparently representing maintained branches, but the bundle does not map each commit to a release. No CWE is assigned. Avoid inferring deterministic privilege escalation: the stated impacts derive from CVSS, while practical exploitability remains unsubstantiated.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to a vendor-supported kernel containing the synchronize_rcu() fix or an equivalent backport.
  • Check distribution and appliance advisories for CVE-2026-43091 and their exact affected package versions.
  • Prioritize multi-tenant, container-hosting, and other systems granting local access to untrusted users.
  • Restrict unnecessary local access and network-namespace capabilities until patched, where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Record running kernel and installed package versions across potentially exposed Linux systems.
  • Confirm vendor changelogs cite CVE-2026-43091 or one of the referenced stable-kernel commits.
  • Verify the deployed kernel includes an RCU grace period before policy_bydst tables are freed.
  • Reboot after kernel replacement, then confirm systems are running the remediated kernel.
  • Monitor kernel logs for unexplained XFRM, RCU, memory-corruption, or namespace-teardown failures.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-43091 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-43091Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxe1e551bc56302b80ff930c966f9985095fb1b70d, e1e551bc56302b80ff930c966f9985095fb1b70d, e1e551bc56302b80ff930c966f9985095fb1b70d, e1e551bc56302b80ff930c966f9985095fb1b70d, e1e551bc56302b80ff930c966f9985095fb1b70dunaffected
LinuxLinux4.9, 0, 6.6.136, 6.12.83, 6.18.24, 6.19.14, 7.0affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.