LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-43003: An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0.

An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. Ironic Python Agent (IPA) sometimes executes grub-install from within a chroot of the deployed partition image, leading to code execution in the case of a malicious image.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-43003 affects OpenStack ironic-python-agent versions 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. During bare-metal deployment, IPA may run grub-install from inside a deployed image. If that image is malicious, it can lead to code execution. This is mainly a risk where image sources are not tightly controlled.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority infrastructure risk for organizations using OpenStack Ironic bare-metal provisioning. Prioritize environments where untrusted or semi-trusted images can enter deployment workflows. No active exploitation is cited in the provided sources.

Technical view

IPA sometimes executes grub-install within a chroot of the deployed partition image. The CVE maps to CWE-78 and CWE-829, with CVSS 8.5 high: network vector, low privileges, high attack complexity, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in OpenStack Ironic environments using ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0, especially where users, tenants, CI/CD systems, or external processes can provide deployment images. Environments using only trusted, controlled images may have lower practical risk, but still need vendor guidance.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and KEV is false. The described precondition is a malicious deployed partition image. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is high complexity but can have severe cross-scope impact if achieved.

Researcher notes

Evidence is clear on the vulnerable behavior and affected IPA range, but the provided bundle does not name a fix, patch version, or confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming downstream product impact beyond OpenStack ironic-python-agent and referenced Red Hat tracking.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OpenStack and Red Hat advisories for fixed versions or official mitigations.
  • Restrict deployment images to trusted, reviewed, and controlled sources.
  • Block tenant-supplied or externally sourced images until risk is assessed.
  • Strengthen image signing, provenance checks, and approval workflows.
  • Review affected IPA versions in Ironic provisioning infrastructure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all OpenStack Ironic deployments and IPA package versions.
  • Confirm whether IPA 1.0.0 through 11.5.0 is present.
  • Review who can create, upload, or select deployment images.
  • Check image provenance, signing, and approval enforcement.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for patch or mitigation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-829: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-43003 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.86redhat-SADP
8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.36mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-43003Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
redhat-SADPironic-python-agent: OpenStack ironic-python-agent: Arbitrary code execution via malicious image
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-01T09:00:58.874Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-01T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenStackironic-python-agent0, 11.0.0, 11.3.0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-829 · source CWE mapping

Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere

Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.