CVE-2026-43003: An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. Ironic Python Agent (IPA) sometimes executes grub-install from within a chroot of the deployed partition image, leading to code execution in the case of a malicious image.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2026-43003 affects OpenStack ironic-python-agent versions 1.0.0 through 11.5.0. During bare-metal deployment, IPA may run grub-install from inside a deployed image. If that image is malicious, it can lead to code execution. This is mainly a risk where image sources are not tightly controlled.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority infrastructure risk for organizations using OpenStack Ironic bare-metal provisioning. Prioritize environments where untrusted or semi-trusted images can enter deployment workflows. No active exploitation is cited in the provided sources.
Technical view
IPA sometimes executes grub-install within a chroot of the deployed partition image. The CVE maps to CWE-78 and CWE-829, with CVSS 8.5 high: network vector, low privileges, high attack complexity, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in OpenStack Ironic environments using ironic-python-agent 1.0.0 through 11.5.0, especially where users, tenants, CI/CD systems, or external processes can provide deployment images. Environments using only trusted, controlled images may have lower practical risk, but still need vendor guidance.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and KEV is false. The described precondition is a malicious deployed partition image. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is high complexity but can have severe cross-scope impact if achieved.
Researcher notes
Evidence is clear on the vulnerable behavior and affected IPA range, but the provided bundle does not name a fix, patch version, or confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming downstream product impact beyond OpenStack ironic-python-agent and referenced Red Hat tracking.
Mitigation direction
Check OpenStack and Red Hat advisories for fixed versions or official mitigations.
Restrict deployment images to trusted, reviewed, and controlled sources.
Block tenant-supplied or externally sourced images until risk is assessed.
Strengthen image signing, provenance checks, and approval workflows.
Review affected IPA versions in Ironic provisioning infrastructure.
Validation and detection
Inventory all OpenStack Ironic deployments and IPA package versions.
Confirm whether IPA 1.0.0 through 11.5.0 is present.
Review who can create, upload, or select deployment images.
Check image provenance, signing, and approval enforcement.
Monitor vendor advisories for patch or mitigation updates.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
6Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-78 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.