CVE-2026-42070: MantisBT: Authorization Bypass in Bugnote Editing via Issue Update API
Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. Prior to 2.28.2, the mc_issue_update() function in MantisBT allows users having update_bug_threshold access (UPDATER, with default settings) to edit, change view state, and modify time tracking on bugnotes belonging to other users — bypassing the default DEVELOPER (level 55) threshold required by the dedicated mc_issue_note_update() function. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.28.2.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
MantisBT before 2.28.2 lets a lower-privileged updater modify other users' bugnotes through the issue update API. This can change note content, visibility, and time tracking, undermining integrity of issue records. It requires an authenticated user with update permission, so urgency is moderate unless MantisBT supports sensitive workflow evidence.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate integrity risk. Prioritize upgrades for MantisBT systems used for customer support, security tracking, compliance evidence, or time accounting because trusted issue history can be altered by lower-privileged authenticated users.
Technical view
The mc_issue_update() function allowed users meeting update_bug_threshold, UPDATER by default, to edit bugnotes owned by others. This bypassed the higher default DEVELOPER threshold enforced by mc_issue_note_update(). The issue is CWE-863 authorization bypass and is fixed in MantisBT 2.28.2.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to MantisBT deployments before 2.28.2 where authenticated users have update_bug_threshold access and can reach the issue update API. Internet exposure increases attack surface, but the vulnerability still requires valid low-privileged credentials.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or public active exploitation evidence. Exploitation would be insider-like or credential-based: an authenticated updater could tamper with another user's bugnotes without the normal authorization level.
Researcher notes
The important authorization mismatch is between mc_issue_update() and mc_issue_note_update(). Focus validation on permission boundaries around bugnote ownership, view state, and time tracking. Do not assume unauthenticated exploitation; the CVSS vector requires low privileges.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade MantisBT to version 2.28.2 or later.
Review the MantisBT GitHub advisory for vendor guidance.
Restrict updater-level access to trusted users until upgraded.
Limit API access where operationally feasible before remediation.
Monitor bugnote edits, visibility changes, and time tracking changes by non-owners.
Validation and detection
Inventory all MantisBT instances and record installed versions.
Confirm no production instance runs a version earlier than 2.28.2.
Review users or groups with update_bug_threshold-level access.
Check whether issue update API access is exposed beyond trusted networks.
After upgrading, verify bugnote edit permissions follow the intended threshold.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-863 · source CWE mapping
Incorrect Authorization
Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.