LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-42070: MantisBT: Authorization Bypass in Bugnote Editing via Issue Update API

Mantis Bug Tracker (MantisBT) is an open source issue tracker. Prior to 2.28.2, the mc_issue_update() function in MantisBT allows users having update_bug_threshold access (UPDATER, with default settings) to edit, change view state, and modify time tracking on bugnotes belonging to other users — bypassing the default DEVELOPER (level 55) threshold required by the dedicated mc_issue_note_update() function. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.28.2.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

MantisBT before 2.28.2 lets a lower-privileged updater modify other users' bugnotes through the issue update API. This can change note content, visibility, and time tracking, undermining integrity of issue records. It requires an authenticated user with update permission, so urgency is moderate unless MantisBT supports sensitive workflow evidence.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate integrity risk. Prioritize upgrades for MantisBT systems used for customer support, security tracking, compliance evidence, or time accounting because trusted issue history can be altered by lower-privileged authenticated users.

Technical view

The mc_issue_update() function allowed users meeting update_bug_threshold, UPDATER by default, to edit bugnotes owned by others. This bypassed the higher default DEVELOPER threshold enforced by mc_issue_note_update(). The issue is CWE-863 authorization bypass and is fixed in MantisBT 2.28.2.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to MantisBT deployments before 2.28.2 where authenticated users have update_bug_threshold access and can reach the issue update API. Internet exposure increases attack surface, but the vulnerability still requires valid low-privileged credentials.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or public active exploitation evidence. Exploitation would be insider-like or credential-based: an authenticated updater could tamper with another user's bugnotes without the normal authorization level.

Researcher notes

The important authorization mismatch is between mc_issue_update() and mc_issue_note_update(). Focus validation on permission boundaries around bugnote ownership, view state, and time tracking. Do not assume unauthenticated exploitation; the CVSS vector requires low privileges.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade MantisBT to version 2.28.2 or later.
  • Review the MantisBT GitHub advisory for vendor guidance.
  • Restrict updater-level access to trusted users until upgraded.
  • Limit API access where operationally feasible before remediation.
  • Monitor bugnote edits, visibility changes, and time tracking changes by non-owners.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all MantisBT instances and record installed versions.
  • Confirm no production instance runs a version earlier than 2.28.2.
  • Review users or groups with update_bug_threshold-level access.
  • Check whether issue update API access is exposed beyond trusted networks.
  • After upgrading, verify bugnote edit permissions follow the intended threshold.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-42070 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-42070Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mantisbtmantisbt< 2.28.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.