CVE-2026-41473: CyberPanel < 2.4.5 Unauthenticated API Access via AI Scanner Endpoints
CyberPanel versions prior to 2.4.5 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the AI Scanner worker API endpoints that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to write arbitrary data to the database by sending requests to the /api/ai-scanner/status-webhook and /api/ai-scanner/callback endpoints. Attackers can exploit the lack of authentication checks to cause denial of service through storage exhaustion, corrupt scan history records, and pollute database fields with malicious data.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CyberPanel before version 2.4.5 exposes two AI Scanner API endpoints without authentication. A remote attacker could submit arbitrary database data, exhaust storage, disrupt service, or corrupt scan records. The supplied evidence does not indicate confidentiality loss or confirmed active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation for every Internet-facing CyberPanel instance. The vulnerability is remotely reachable, requires no credentials, and can materially disrupt hosting operations or undermine scan-record integrity. Accelerate investigation where storage growth, service instability, or unexpected scan data is already visible.
Technical view
CVE-2026-41473 is a CWE-306 authentication failure affecting /api/ai-scanner/status-webhook and /api/ai-scanner/callback. Network-accessible requests require no privileges or user interaction and can write attacker-controlled database data. CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.8, with high integrity and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Internet-accessible CyberPanel installations running versions before 2.4.5 are the primary concern, particularly where the affected API routes are reachable. Internal-only deployments remain exposed to attackers with network access. The bundle does not provide deployment prevalence or evidence identifying specific compromised organizations.
Exploitation context
A public technical write-up is tagged as containing exploit information, increasing reproducibility risk. However, the CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence confirms active exploitation. Treat public endpoint exposure as urgent without claiming exploitation has occurred.
Researcher notes
The published affected-version metadata uses a commit boundary, while the advisory title describes versions before 2.4.5. Validate both package version and deployed code provenance. The supplied CVSS vector indicates no confidentiality impact, but high vulnerable-system integrity and availability impact. Evidence is insufficient to characterize exploitation frequency or downstream database constraints.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade CyberPanel to version 2.4.5 or later after confirming current vendor guidance.
Restrict external access to the affected AI Scanner endpoints until upgrading.
Back up and inspect the database before remediation if suspicious activity is present.
Monitor storage consumption and database integrity during the remediation period.
Validation and detection
Inventory CyberPanel instances and record their exact versions or commit identifiers.
Confirm affected installations are upgraded to version 2.4.5 or later.
Verify both AI Scanner endpoints enforce the authentication behavior introduced by the patch.
Review request logs for unauthenticated or anomalous traffic to both affected endpoints.
Check storage growth, scan histories, and related database fields for unexplained changes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-306: Credential and account abuse lookup
Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-306 · source CWE mapping
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Missing Authentication for Critical Function represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.