Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A flaw in Azure Monitor Action Group notifications could let an already authorized attacker misuse server-side requests to gain greater privileges. Successful exploitation could expose or alter sensitive information, although the supplied record does not indicate an availability impact.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority Azure control-plane risk. Quickly establish whether Action Group notifications are used, assign remediation ownership, and follow Microsoft's advisory. Escalate environments connected to sensitive systems, while avoiding claims of active exploitation without further evidence.
Technical view
CVE-2026-41105 is a network-reachable SSRF vulnerability, CWE-918, in the Azure Monitor Action Group notification system. CVSS 3.1 rates it 8.1: low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Organizations using Azure Monitor Action Group notifications may be exposed. The source bundle does not identify affected versions, configurations, tenants, or prerequisites beyond requiring an authorized attacker, so precise exposure cannot be determined from these sources.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV within the supplied bundle, and the CVSS exploit-maturity metric is unproven. No cited source establishes active exploitation or public exploit availability. Exploitation nevertheless requires only network access, low privileges, and no user interaction.
Researcher notes
The public bundle provides the vulnerability class and CVSS vector but no affected versions, attack-path detail, indicators, or explicit remediation instructions. The Microsoft reference is tagged as a patch source; however, its actual remediation content is not included, so researchers should consult it directly.
Mitigation direction
- Review the Microsoft advisory for the applicable vendor remediation and deployment requirements.
- Inventory Azure environments using Monitor Action Group notifications and identify responsible owners.
- Restrict authorized access to Action Group configuration using least-privilege controls.
- Prioritize remediation for environments handling sensitive monitoring data or privileged notification integrations.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether each Azure tenant uses Monitor Action Group notifications.
- Compare deployed configurations against the affected scope stated in Microsoft's advisory.
- Verify the Microsoft-prescribed remediation is applied wherever the service is affected.
- Review relevant Azure audit records for unexpected Action Group configuration or privilege changes.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupPrivilege behavior lookup
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCloud metadata behavior lookup
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-41105 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.1 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C2.85.2microsoftVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.1HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- Azure Monitor Action Group Notification System Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityCVE reference, microsoft · vendor-advisory, patch
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.