LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-40683: In OpenStack Keystone before 28.0.1, the LDAP identity backend does not convert the user enabled attribute...

In OpenStack Keystone before 28.0.1, the LDAP identity backend does not convert the user enabled attribute to a boolean when the user_enabled_invert configuration option is False (the default). The _ldap_res_to_model method in the UserApi class only performed string-to-boolean conversion when user_enabled_invert was True. When False, the raw string value from LDAP (e.g., "FALSE") was used directly. Since non-empty strings are truthy in Python, users marked as disabled in LDAP were treated as enabled by Keystone, allowing them to authenticate and perform actions. All deployments using the LDAP identity backend without user_enabled_invert=True or user_enabled_emulation are affected.

HighCVSS 7.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Keystone can mistakenly treat an LDAP account marked disabled as enabled. An affected user could still authenticate and act through OpenStack, undermining account suspension and potentially affecting confidentiality, integrity, and service availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent wherever LDAP-backed Keystone is used. Account-disable controls may be ineffective, so immediately identify affected configurations, apply a confirmed fix, and investigate whether disabled accounts authenticated while vulnerable.

Technical view

Before Keystone 28.0.1, the LDAP backend leaves the enabled attribute as a string when user_enabled_invert is False. Python treats non-empty strings, including "FALSE", as true. Deployments using LDAP without inversion or enabled emulation are affected. CVSS 3.1 is 7.7 (high), categorized as CWE-843.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Keystone deployments using the LDAP identity backend where user_enabled_invert is not True and user_enabled_emulation is not configured. Confirm exact branch exposure because the supplied version data does not identify fixed backports for older supported releases.

Exploitation context

The bundle reports that this CVE is not in KEV and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires an account represented as disabled in LDAP, but successful authentication could permit actions that administrators expected the disabled state to prevent.

Researcher notes

The defect is a type-conversion error: a raw LDAP string crosses an authorization boundary without boolean normalization. The supplied record identifies 28.0.1 as fixed, but branch-specific backport coverage is incomplete. Validation should focus on effective configuration and disabled-account behavior without assuming every Keystone deployment is exposed.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Keystone to 28.0.1 or a vendor-confirmed fixed backport.
  • Check current OpenStack guidance for branch-specific patches before upgrading older releases.
  • Evaluate enabled inversion or emulation only after confirming the intended LDAP attribute semantics.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Keystone versions and identify deployments using the LDAP identity backend.
  • Check effective user_enabled_invert and user_enabled_emulation settings.
  • Using a controlled test account, verify that LDAP-disabled users cannot authenticate.
  • Review successful authentication and activity associated with accounts disabled in LDAP.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-843: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-40683 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.7CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H1.85.3mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.7High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-40683Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenStackKeystone8.0.0, 26.0.0, 27.0.0, 28.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-843 · source CWE mapping

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.