LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-39975: Combodo iTop: Remote code execution using external auth variable value

Combodo iTop is a web-based IT service management tool. Prior to 3.2.3, unauthenticated users could delete the .readonly file on iTop instances, leading to code execution. This file, created during the setup process, prevents users from performing write actions. This issue has been fixed in version 3.2.3.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Combodo iTop versions before 3.2.3 contain a critical flaw that can allow code execution after the protective .readonly file is deleted. The supplied description says unauthenticated users can trigger this condition, potentially exposing IT service-management data and the underlying system to compromise.

Executive priority

Treat this as an urgent remediation item because successful exploitation could permit broad system compromise. Prioritize externally reachable instances, upgrade to 3.2.3 or later, and investigate potentially exposed systems. Current sources do not establish active exploitation.

Technical view

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-94 and remote code execution. The supplied description connects attacker-controlled external-authentication data with deletion of the setup-created .readonly file, removing write protections and enabling code execution. However, the CVSS vector states high privileges are required, conflicting with the unauthenticated description.

Likely exposure

Any iTop instance earlier than 3.2.3 is potentially affected. Risk is greatest where the application is reachable by untrusted users. The supplied sources do not define affected configurations, external-authentication prerequisites, or reliable indicators of compromise.

Exploitation context

The bundle reports network reachability, low complexity, no user interaction, and severe confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. It marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation or public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The supplied narrative says unauthenticated users could delete .readonly, but CVSS 4.0 lists PR:H. This material inconsistency should be resolved against Combodo's advisory before finalizing attack-path assumptions. No exploit mechanics, affected configuration details, or compromise indicators are included in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected iTop installations to version 3.2.3 or later.
  • Consult Combodo's advisory for deployment-specific remediation and prerequisite details.
  • Restrict untrusted network access until affected instances are upgraded.
  • Preserve relevant application and system evidence before remediation if compromise is suspected.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory every iTop instance and record its exact installed version.
  • Confirm all instances earlier than 3.2.3 are upgraded successfully.
  • Determine whether affected instances were reachable by unauthenticated or otherwise untrusted users.
  • Check Combodo's advisory for authoritative indicators and post-upgrade verification guidance.
  • Investigate unexpected changes involving .readonly or unauthorized write activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-39975 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H——GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-39975Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CombodoiTop< 3.2.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code

Improper Control of Generation of Code represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.