LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-39364: Vite has a `server.fs.deny` bypass with queries

Vite is a frontend tooling framework for JavaScript. From 7.1.0 to before 7.3.2 and 8.0.5, on the Vite dev server, files that should be blocked by server.fs.deny (e.g., .env, *.crt) can be retrieved with HTTP 200 responses when query parameters such as ?raw, ?import&raw, or ?import&url&inline are appended. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.3.2 and 8.0.5.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An exposed Vite development server may return sensitive files that its deny policy should block when specially formed query parameters are added. This could disclose environment files, certificates, credentials, or other project secrets. The issue affects specified Vite 7, Vite 8, and Vite+ versions; production applications without a reachable development server are less likely to be exposed.

Executive priority

Treat internet-accessible affected development servers as urgent because unauthenticated disclosure could expose credentials and enable follow-on compromise. Patch promptly, restrict access immediately, and assess whether secrets were retrieved. Internal-only instances remain high-priority but can be sequenced according to reachability and sensitivity.

Technical view

CVE-2026-39364 is an access-control bypass in Vite's development server. Query handling can bypass server.fs.deny and return blocked files with HTTP 200 responses. The supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 8.2: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, with high confidentiality impact but no stated integrity or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Highest risk exists where an affected Vite or Vite+ development server is reachable by untrusted users and sensitive files reside within accessible project paths. Internet-facing, shared-network, preview, or improperly promoted development environments deserve immediate review. The source bundle does not establish exposure for ordinary static production builds.

Exploitation context

The bypass uses Vite-supported query processing to circumvent file-deny decisions. The source bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. That does not prove exploitation is absent; review reachable servers and request logs for suspicious access to denied resources.

Researcher notes

Relevant affected ranges are Vite 7.1.0 through 7.3.1, Vite 8.0.0 through 8.0.4, and Vite+ below 0.1.16. The weakness maps to inconsistent interpretation, improper authorization, and external input modification. Evidence supplied establishes confidentiality exposure, not code execution, integrity loss, availability impact, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Vite 7 installations to version 7.3.2 or later.
  • Upgrade Vite 8 installations to version 8.0.5 or later.
  • Move Vite+ installations outside the affected range below 0.1.16, following vendor guidance.
  • Restrict development-server access to trusted networks until remediation is verified.
  • Rotate exposed secrets if logs or investigation indicate sensitive-file access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Vite and Vite+ versions across development, preview, CI, and hosted environments.
  • Identify development servers reachable from the internet or other untrusted networks.
  • Review server.fs.deny configuration and locate sensitive files within served project paths.
  • Inspect access logs for denied-file requests containing raw, import, url, or inline query parameters.
  • After upgrading, verify blocked sensitive files no longer return successful responses.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-180: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-472: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-39364 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NGitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.2High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-39364Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPvite: Vite: Information disclosure via query parameter manipulation on the development server
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-04-07T20:02:18.458Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-07T19:12:47.577Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vitejsvite>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.5, >= 7.1.0, < 7.3.2Listed
vitejsvite-plus< 0.1.16Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-180 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize

Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-472 · source CWE mapping

External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter

External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.